Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37635853›Full record

ArticleRomanian journal of anaesthesia and intensive care2023

Rectus Sheath Block in Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Yerkin Abdildin, Karina Tapinova, Azamat Salamat, Ramazan Shaimakhanov, Alisher Aitbayev, Dmitriy Viderman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Romanian journal of anaesthesia and intensive care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07055438 (Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Bilateral External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block Versus Rectus Sheath Block in Upper Abdominal Surgeries), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07055438 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Bilateral External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block Versus Rectus Sheath Block in Upper Abdominal Surgeries: A Randomized Double-blinded Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorKasr El Aini HospitalRan2025 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsPost Operative AnalgesiaArmsUltrasound guided Rectus sheath block, ultrasound guided external oblique intercostal plane block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yerkin AbdildinSchool of Engineering and Digital Sciences, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Karina TapinovaNazarbayev University School of Medicine (NUSOM), Department of Biomedical Sciences, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Azamat SalamatSchool of Engineering and Digital Sciences, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Ramazan ShaimakhanovSchool of Engineering and Digital Sciences, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Alisher AitbayevSchool of Engineering and Digital Sciences, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Dmitriy VidermanNazarbayev University School of Medicine (NUSOM), Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Medical Centre, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Nazarbayev University · KZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: With the development of ultrasound-guided and laparoscopic techniques of rectus sheath block (RSB), regional analgesia promises to be efficient and safe. However, studies show controversial results. Our systematic review with meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effect of rectus sheath block in abdominal surgery. Method: We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library from inception to October 2021 for randomised controlled trials written in English. We included studies on adult populations undergoing abdominal surgery. The primary outcomes of our meta-analysis were postoperative pain intensity and postoperative opioid consumption. Data analysis was conducted using the Review Manager software (RevMan, v. 5.4). Statistical heterogeneity was estimated by the I Results: Eight randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in English with a total of 386 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Patients in the RSB group did not consume fewer anaesthetics and opioids after abdominal surgery when compared with patients in the control group. In addition, postoperative pain intensity (out of 10) was not lower in the RSB group when compared with the control group. Finally, RSB did not improve the time to the first opioid/analgesic (min) compared with the non-RSB option. Conclusion: There is no statistically significant evidence in favour of RSB over non-RSB in reducing anaesthetics and opioid consumption, postoperative pain intensity, and increasing time to first opioid/analgesic.

Indexed as

abdominal surgeryopioid consumptionpostoperative pain intensityrectus sheath blocktime to first opioid

Identifiers

PMID37635853
PMCPMC10448445
OpenAlexW4386209281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.