Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37635843›Full record

Trial reportNEJM evidence2022

Computerized Games versus Crosswords Training in Mild Cognitive Impairment.

D P Devanand, Terry E Goldberg, Min Qian, Sara N Rushia, Joel R Sneed, Howard F Andrews, Izael Nino, Julia Phillips, Sierra T Pence, Alexandra R Linares and 5 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in NEJM evidence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03205709 nacompletednot on this map

Cognitive Training and Neuroplasticity in Mild Cognitive Impairment

TypeinterventionalSponsorNew York State Psychiatric InstituteRan2017 to 2021Enrolled107ConditionsMild Cognitive Impairment, Memory Disorders, Memory Impairment, Cognitive ImpairmentArmsComputerized Cognitive Training, Crossword Puzzles
NCT06601933 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Cognitive Training and Neuroplasticity in Mild Cognitive Impairment: COGIT-2 Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorColumbia UniversityRan2024 to 2030Enrolled240ConditionsMild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), Cognitive TrainingArmsCognitive Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

D P DevanandDivision of Geriatric Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York.
Terry E GoldbergDivision of Geriatric Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York.
Min QianDepartment of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York.
Sara N RushiaThe Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York.
Joel R SneedDivision of Geriatric Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York.
Howard F AndrewsDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, New York.
Izael NinoDivision of Geriatric Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York.
Julia PhillipsDivision of Geriatric Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York.
Sierra T PenceNeurocognitive Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Alexandra R LinaresNeurocognitive Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Caroline A HellegersNeurocognitive Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Andrew M MichaelDuke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Nancy A KernerDivision of Geriatric Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York.
Jeffrey R PetrellaDepartment of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
P Murali DoraiswamyNeurocognitive Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Duke University · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USNew York State Psychiatric InstituteCity University of New York · USNew York Psychoanalytic Society and Institute · USThe Graduate Center, CUNY · US

Funding

COGNITIVE TRAINING AND NEUROPLASTICY IN MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENTR01AG052440 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DAVANGERE P DEVANAND · 2017 to 2026
$9.3M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG052440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMild cognitive impairment (MCI) increases the risk of dementia. The efficacy of cognitive training in patients with MCI is unclear.

methodsIn a two-site, single-blinded, 78-week trial, participants with MCI - stratified by age, severity (early/late MCI), and site - were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of intensive, home-based, computerized training with Web-based cognitive games or Web-based crossword puzzles, followed by six booster sessions. In mixed-model analyses, the primary outcome was change from baseline in the 11-item Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) score, a 70 point scale in which higher scores indicate greater cognitive impairment at 78 weeks, adjusted for baseline. Secondary outcomes included change from baseline in neuropsychological composite score, University of California San Diego Performance-Based Skills Assessment (functional outcome) score, and Functional Activities Questionnaire (functional outcome) score at 78 weeks, adjusted for baseline. Changes in hippocampal volume and cortical thickness on magnetic resonance imaging were assessed.

resultsAmong 107 participants (n=51 [games]; n=56 [crosswords]), ADAS-Cog score worsened slightly for games and improved for crosswords at week 78 (least squares [LS] means difference, -1.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.83 to -0.06; P=0.04). From baseline to week 78, mean ADAS-Cog score worsened for games (9.53 to 9.93) and improved for crosswords (9.59 to 8.61). The late MCI subgroup showed similar results (LS means difference, -2.45; SE, 0.89; 95% CI, -4.21 to -0.70). Among secondary outcomes, the Functional Activities Questionnaire score worsened more with games than with crosswords at week 78 (LS means difference, -1.08; 95% CI, -1.97 to -0.18). Other secondary outcomes showed no differences. Decreases in hippocampal volume and cortical thickness were greater for games than for crosswords (LS means difference, 34.07; SE, 17.12; 95% CI, 0.51 to 67.63 [hippocampal volume]; LS means difference, 0.02; SE, 0.01; 95% CI, 0.00 to 0.04 [cortical thickness]).

conclusionsHome-based computerized training with crosswords demonstrated superior efficacy to games for the primary outcome of baseline-adjusted change in ADAS-Cog score over 78 weeks. (Supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03205709.).

Identifiers

PMID37635843
PMCPMC10457124
OpenAlexW4307721736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.