Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37635729›Full record

ArticleGlobal epidemiology2021

An intuitive framework for Bayesian posterior simulation methods.

Razieh Bidhendi Yarandi, Mohammad Ali Mansournia, Hojjat Zeraati, Kazem Mohammad

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global epidemiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Razieh Bidhendi YarandiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Ali MansourniaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hojjat ZeraatiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Kazem MohammadDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Bayesian inference has become popular. It offers several pragmatic approaches to account for uncertainty in inference decision-making. Various estimation methods have been introduced to implement Bayesian methods. Although these algorithms are powerful, they are not always easy to grasp for non-statisticians. This paper aims to provide an intuitive framework of four essential Bayesian computational methods for epidemiologists and other health researchers. We do not cover an extensive mathematical discussion of these approaches, but instead offer a non-quantitative description of these algorithms and provide some illuminating examples. Materials and methods: Bayesian computational methods, namely importance sampling, rejection sampling, Markov chain Monte Carlo, and data augmentation are presented. Results and conclusions: The substantial amount of research published on Bayesian inference has highlighted its popularity among researchers, while the basic concepts are not always straightforward for interested learners. We show that alternative approaches such as a weighted prior approach, which are intuitively appealing and easy-to-understand, work well in the case of low-dimensional problems and appropriate prior information. Otherwise, MCMC is a trouble-free tool in those cases.

Indexed as

Bayesian methodsData augmentationImportance samplingMCMCRejection sampling

Identifiers

PMID37635729
PMCPMC10445998
OpenAlexW3196052873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.