Trial reportAmerican journal of hematology2023
Phase II study of cladribine, idarubicin, and ara-C (CLIA) with or without sorafenib as initial therapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia.
Trial report in American journal of hematology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and efficacy of combining midostaurin and gemtuzumab ozogamicin with induction chemotherapy in FLT3-mutated AML.Blood advances · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Integrating ex vivo drug sensitivity and genetic mutation analysis improves prediction of chemotherapy response in acute myeloid leukemia.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Article
- SMURF2-Mediated Ubiquitination and Degradation of HOXA5 Augments Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Alveolar Epithelial Type II Cells Induced by LPS.Molecular biotechnology · 2026Article
- Clinico-genomic characterization of RAS-mutant acute myeloid leukemia.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- MECOM fusion partner and bone marrow blast percentage influence outcomes of patients with MECOM rearranged acute myeloid leukaemia.British journal of haematology · 2025Article
- Impact of measurable residual disease clearance kinetics in patients with AML undergoing intensive chemotherapy.Blood advances · 2025Article
- Venetoclax-Based Combination Regimens in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Blood cancer discovery · 2025Review
- Intensification of upfront chemotherapy for patients with myeloid blast phase CML: a single center experience.Annals of hematology · 2024Article
- Trends in allogeneic transplantation for favorable risk acute myeloid leukemia in first remission: a longitudinal study of >15 years from the ALWP of the EBMT.Bone marrow transplantation · 2024Article
- Current status and research directions in acute myeloid leukemia.Blood cancer journal · 2024Review
- Molecular precision medicine: Multi-omics-based stratification model for acute myeloid leukemia.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Combination therapy with novel agents for acute myeloid leukaemia: Insights into treatment of a heterogenous disease.British journal of haematology · 2024Review
- Acute myeloid leukemia management and research in 2025.CA: a cancer journal for cliniciansReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The addition of cladribine, or sorafenib to standard chemotherapy have each demonstrated improved survival in patients with newly-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We studied the combination of cladribine, idarubicin, and intermediate-dose cytarabine (CLIA) in patients ≤65 years of age with newly diagnosed AML, fit to receive intensive therapy. Cladribine (5 mg/m2) IV was administered on days (D)1-5, cytarabine (1 g/m2) on D1-5, and idarubicin (10 mg/m2) on D1-3. Sorafenib was added to the CLIA backbone for patients with FLT3-ITD mutated AML. 80 patients were enrolled: 65 with newly diagnosed AML and 15 with AML arising from previously treated MDS (ts-AML). The median age was 55 years (range, 21-65). CR + CRi was 83% (54/65) and 27% in the untreated and ts-AML cohorts, respectively; 74% and 75% of responding patients, respectively, had undetectable measurable residual disease (MRD). Among patients with FLT3-ITD mutated AML receiving CLIA+sorafenib, the CR + CRi rate was 95%, with 81% negative for MRD. With a median follow-up of 76 months, the 2- and 4-year OS of 57% and 50% compared to 20%, and 13% for ts-AML, respectively. Patients treated with CLIA+sorafenib had 2- and 5-year OS rates of 63% and 59%, respectively. The most common Grade ≥3 adverse events were infection/fever, elevated bilirubin, rash, and nausea. CLIA was safe and effective in young, fit patients with newly diagnosed AML with inferior outcomes among patients with ts-AML. The addition of sorafenib to CLIA in FLT3-ITD mutated AML resulted in high rates of durable remission and excellent long-term survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.