ArticleSkeletal radiology2024
Intraosseous pressure measurement during iliac bone marrow biopsy: its feasibility and difference of IOP in diseased marrow and non-diseased marrow.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intraosseous pressure measurement of cystic bone lesions and comparison with normal marrow.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe purposes of this study were (1) to establish the feasibility and safety of an imaging-guided technique for intraosseous pressure (IOP) measurement in a large cohort of patients, and (2) to compare IOP values between normal and diseased bone marrow.
methodsAdult patients undergoing CT-guided marrow biopsy were prospectively and consecutively enrolled from November 2020 to February 2022. IOP measurements were obtained connecting the biopsy needle to a monitoring device using a standard arterial line setup. Clinical data including sex, age and pathology results were obtained. Student t test and Pearson correlation were used for continuous variables comparisons. Univariable analyses were performed using Fisher's exact test. A P value of .05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsA total of 139 participants were initially enrolled, and four were excluded during technique optimization. There were no complications related to the measurement technique. Ninety participants (90/135, 67%) had histology confirming marrow pathology. The participants in the diseased marrow group were older than those in the normal marrow group (63 ± 14 vs. 55 ± 14 years; P < .01). There was no difference in mean IOP between both groups (66 ± 23 vs. 64 ± 28 mmHg; P = .69). There was no correlation between mean arterial blood pressure and mean IOP (P = .08).
conclusionThere was no difference in IOP measurements between patients with normal and diseased marrow undergoing CT-guided biopsy. IOP does not appear to be influenced by systemic blood pressure. No complication occurred during the procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.