Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37635131›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2023

A latent functional approach for modeling the effects of multidimensional exposures on disease risk.

Sungduk Kim, Laura E Beane Freeman, Paul S Albert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sungduk KimDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7985-7204
Laura E Beane FreemanDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Paul S AlbertDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1658-1068

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the relationships between exposure and disease incidence is an important problem in environmental epidemiology. Typically, a large number of these exposures are measured, and it is found either that a few exposures transmit risk or that each exposure transmits a small amount of risk, but, taken together, these may pose a substantial disease risk. Further, these exposure effects can be nonlinear. We develop a latent functional approach, which assumes that the individual effect of each exposure can be characterized as one of a series of unobserved functions, where the number of latent functions is less than or equal to the number of exposures. We propose Bayesian methodology to fit models with a large number of exposures and show that existing Bayesian group LASSO approaches are a special case of the proposed model. An efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling algorithm is developed for carrying out Bayesian inference. The deviance information criterion is used to choose an appropriate number of nonlinear latent functions. We demonstrate the good properties of the approach using simulation studies. Further, we show that complex exposure relationships can be represented with only a few latent functional curves. The proposed methodology is illustrated with an analysis of the effect of cumulative pesticide exposure on cancer risk in a large cohort of farmers.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureModels, StatisticalAlgorithmsBayes TheoremComputer SimulationHumansMarkov ChainsMonte Carlo MethodPesticidesRisk AssessmentPesticideschemical mixturescorrelated datadata reductionlatent class modelrisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID37635131
PMCPMC11984352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.