ArticleYonsei medical journal2023
A Radiomics-Based Model for Potentially More Accurate Identification of Subtypes of Breast Cancer Brain Metastases.
Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Saliency-Curated Deep Learning for Predicting Receptor Status in Breast Cancer Brain Metastases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- ADC Histogram Features of Breast Cancer Brain Metastases as Candidate Imaging Biomarkers of Primary Tumor ER, PR, Ki-67, and Luminal Status.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Prediction of hormone receptor status in breast cancer brain metastases using an MRI-based multimodal deep learning framework.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Article
- Aurantio-obtusin modulates Wilms Tumour 1 within the breast tumour microenvironment reducing immunosuppression and tumour growth.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2025Article
- Review
- A machine learning approach to predict postoperative sleep disturbance after total knee arthroplasty: a comparative study of multiple algorithms.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Diagnostics and Screening in Breast Cancer with Brain and Leptomeningeal Metastasis: A Review of the Literature.Cancers · 2024Review
- Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models to Predict Postoperative Delirium Using Clinical Features and Polysomnography Variables.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Development and Validation of Artificial Intelligence Models for Prognosis Prediction of Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy with Clinical and Radiological Features.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Fat Biology in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Immune Regulation, Fibrosis, and Senescence.Journal of obesity & metabolic syndrome · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeBreast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) may involve subtypes that differ from the primary breast cancer lesion. This study aimed to develop a radiomics-based model that utilizes preoperative brain MRI for multiclass classification of BCBM subtypes and to investigate whether the model offers better prediction accuracy than the assumption that primary lesions and their BCBMs would be of the same subtype (non-conversion model) in an external validation set. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe training and external validation sets each comprised 51 cases (102 cases total). Four machine learning classifiers combined with three feature selection methods were trained on radiomic features and primary lesion subtypes for prediction of the following four subtypes: 1) hormone receptor (HR)+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-, 2) HR+/HER2+, 3) HR-/HER2+, and 4) triple-negative. After training, the performance of the radiomics-based model was compared to that of the non-conversion model in an external validation set using accuracy and F1-macro scores.
resultsThe rate of discrepant subtypes between primary lesions and their respective BCBMs were 25.5% (n=13 of 51) in the training set and 23.5% (n=12 of 51) in the external validation set. In the external validation set, the accuracy and F1-macro score of the radiomics-based model were significantly higher than those of the non-conversion model (0.902 vs. 0.765,
conclusionOur radiomics-based model represents an incremental advance in the classification of BCBM subtypes, thereby facilitating a more appropriate personalized therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.