Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37634221›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2026

Deep learning model with collage images for the segmentation of dedicated breast positron emission tomography images.

Tomoki Imokawa, Yoko Satoh, Tomoyuki Fujioka, Kanae Takahashi, Mio Mori, Kazunori Kubota, Hiroshi Onishi, Ukihide Tateishi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Evolution and Clinical Impact of Deep Learning Technologies in Breast MRI.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tomoki ImokawaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3031-2737
Yoko SatohYamanashi PET Imaging Clinic, Chuo City, Yamanashi Prefecture, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0188-0906
Tomoyuki FujiokaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan. fjokmrad@tmd.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7141-8901
Kanae TakahashiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Mio MoriDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6107-4519
Kazunori KubotaDepartment of Radiology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Saitama Prefecture, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3240-4910
Hiroshi OnishiDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Chuo City, Yamanashi Prefecture, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3512-1166
Ukihide TateishiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDedicated breast positron emission tomography (dbPET) has high contrast and resolution optimized for detecting small breast cancers, leading to its noisy characteristics. This study evaluated the application of deep learning to the automatic segmentation of abnormal uptakes on dbPET to facilitate the assessment of lesions. To address data scarcity in model training, we used collage images composed of cropped abnormal uptakes and normal breasts for data augmentation.

methodsThis retrospective study included 1598 examinations between April 2015 and August 2020. A U-Net-based model with an uptake shape classification head was trained using either the original or augmented dataset comprising collage images. The Dice score, which measures the pixel-wise agreement between a prediction and its ground truth, of the models was compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Moreover, the classification accuracies were evaluated.

resultsAfter applying the exclusion criteria, 662 breasts were included; among these, 217 breasts had abnormal uptakes (mean age: 58 ± 14 years). Abnormal uptakes on the cranio-caudal and mediolateral maximum intensity projection images of 217 breasts were annotated and labeled as focus, mass, or non-mass. The inclusion of collage images into the original dataset yielded a Dice score of 0.884 and classification accuracy of 91.5%. Improvement in the Dice score was observed across all subgroups, and the score of images without breast cancer improved significantly from 0.750 to 0.834 (effect size: 0.76, P = 0.02).

conclusionsDeep learning can be applied for the automatic segmentation of dbPET, and collage images can improve model performance.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPositron-Emission TomographyAdultAgedBreastFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies18F-FluorodeoxyglucoseBreast cancerDedicated breast PETDeep learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.