ArticleEuropean heart journal2024
Coronary flow capacity and survival prediction after revascularization: physiological basis and clinical implications.
Article in European heart journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimal medical care and coronary flow capacity-guided myocardial revascularization vs usual care for chronic coronary artery disease: the CENTURY trial.European heart journal · 2025Trial
- Multiorgan Perfusion by PET: Potential Multiple Pathophysiology Interacting with the Heart to Guide Systemic and Cardiac Management.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026Article
- Long term prognostic value of coronary atherosclerotic burden, myocardial perfusion and coronary flow capacity byEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Article
- Read the Data for Diverse Truths-and Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion Versus Angiography.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Refractory angina: mechanisms and stratified treatment in obstructive and non-obstructive chronic myocardial ischaemic syndromes.European heart journal · 2025Review
- Vascular (dys)function in the failing heart.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2025Review
- The impact of fast vs. slow rubidium-82 infusion profile on precision and accuracy of PET myocardial blood flow perfusion metrics using a 1-tissue compartment model.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Article
- Myocardial perfusion and oxidative metabolism in healthy subjects: sex-specific insights from vasodilatory stressEJNMMI research · 2025Article
- Deciphering the angiogenic potential of Zhishi Xiebai Guizhi decoction in coronary heart disease: an in-depth network pharmacology and experimental investigation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Emerging Applications of Positron Emission Tomography in Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Coronary artery calcium measurement on attenuation correction computed tomography using artificial intelligence: correlation with coronary flow capacity and prognosis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Prognostic Value of Coronary Flow Capacity byCirculation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2024Article
- Reproducibility of quantitative myocardial perfusion and coronary flow capacity by positron emission tomography: 3D digital silicon photomultiplier solid state vs. legacy 2D analogue systems for clinical practice and trials.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2024Article
- Impact on cardiovascular outcome of coronary revascularization-induced changes in ischemic perfusion defect and myocardial flow reserve.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
24 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsCoronary flow capacity (CFC) is associated with an observed 10-year survival probability for individual patients before and after actual revascularization for comparison to virtual hypothetical ideal complete revascularization.
methodsStress myocardial perfusion (mL/min/g) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) per pixel were quantified in 6979 coronary artery disease (CAD) subjects using Rb-82 positron emission tomography (PET) for CFC maps of artery-specific size-severity abnormalities expressed as percent left ventricle with prospective follow-up to define survival probability per-decade as fraction of 1.0.
resultsSeverely reduced CFC in 6979 subjects predicted low survival probability that improved by 42% after revascularization compared with no revascularization for comparable severity (P = .0015). For 283 pre-and-post-procedure PET pairs, severely reduced regional CFC-associated survival probability improved heterogeneously after revascularization (P < .001), more so after bypass surgery than percutaneous coronary interventions (P < .001) but normalized in only 5.7%; non-severe baseline CFC or survival probability did not improve compared with severe CFC (P = .00001). Observed CFC-associated survival probability after actual revascularization was lower than virtual ideal hypothetical complete post-revascularization survival probability due to residual CAD or failed revascularization (P < .001) unrelated to gender or microvascular dysfunction. Severely reduced CFC in 2552 post-revascularization subjects associated with low survival probability also improved after repeat revascularization compared with no repeat procedures (P = .025).
conclusionsSeverely reduced CFC and associated observed survival probability improved after first and repeat revascularization compared with no revascularization for comparable CFC severity. Non-severe CFC showed no benefit. Discordance between observed actual and virtual hypothetical post-revascularization survival probability revealed residual CAD or failed revascularization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.