ArticleScientific reports2023
Reproducibility of continuous glucose monitoring results under real-life conditions in an adult population: a functional data analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Imprecision nutrition? Intraindividual variability of glucose responses to duplicate presented meals in adults without diabetes.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2025Trial
- Interpreting Continuous Glucose Monitoring Through Metabolic Physiology: A Framework for Precision Nutrition in Type 2 Diabetes.Nutrients · 2026Review
- The Effect of Hunger on the Likelihood of Glucose Excursions in Adults with Overweight or Obesity: Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Ecological Momentary Assessment Observational Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Observational
- Dynamic Sleep-Derived Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability Features Associated with Glucose Metabolism Status: An Exploratory Feature-Selection Study Using Consumer Wearables.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Coefficient of Variation to Assess the Reproducibility of Meal-Induced Glycemic Responses: Development of a Clustering Algorithm.JMIR diabetes · 2025Article
- The Challenges of Postoperative Tissue Flap Vitality Monitoring in Obese Individuals.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Analysis 2.0: Functional Data Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence Applications.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Asymptomatic Fasting Hypoglycemia in Outpatients Without Diabetes.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025Article
- Clinical evaluation of a polarization-based optical noninvasive glucose sensing system.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Are standardized conditions needed for correct CGM data interpretation in subjects at early stages of glucose intolerance?Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Article
- Accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring systems in intensive care unit patients: a scoping review.Intensive care medicine · 2024Article
- Myths and methodologies: Assessing glycaemic control and associated regulatory mechanisms in human physiology research.Experimental physiology · 2024Review
- Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Prediabetes: What Are the Best Metrics?Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2024Review
- Real World Interstitial Glucose Profiles of a Large Cohort of Physically Active Men and Women.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Imprecision nutrition? Duplicate meals result in unreliable individual glycemic responses measured by continuous glucose monitors across four dietary patterns in adults without diabetes.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Continuous glucose monitoring systems (CGM) are a very useful tool to understand the behaviour of glucose in different situations and populations. Despite the widespread use of CGM systems in both clinical practice and research, our understanding of the reproducibility of CGM data remains limited. The present work examines the reproducibility of the results provided by a CGM system in a random sample of a free-living adult population, from a functional data analysis approach. Functional intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to assess the reproducibility of CGM results in 581 individuals. 62% were females 581 participants (62% women) mean age 48 years (range 18-87) were included, 12% had previously been diagnosed with diabetes. The inter-day reproducibility of the CGM results was greater for subjects with diabetes (ICC 0.46 [CI 0.39-0.55]) than for normoglycaemic subjects (ICC 0.30 [CI 0.27-0.33]); the value for prediabetic subjects was intermediate (ICC 0.37 [CI 0.31-0.42]). For normoglycaemic subjects, inter-day reproducibility was poorer among the younger (ICC 0.26 [CI 0.21-0.30]) than the older subjects (ICC 0.39 [CI 0.32-0.45]). Inter-day reproducibility was poorest among normoglycaemic subjects, especially younger normoglycaemic subjects, suggesting the need to monitor some patient groups more often than others.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.