Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37633991›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2023

Haloperidol for the treatment of delirium in critically ill patients: an updated systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Nina Christine Andersen-Ranberg, Marija Barbateskovic, Anders Perner, Marie Oxenbøll Collet, Lone Musaeus Poulsen, Mathieu van der Jagt, Lisa Smit, Jørn Wetterslev, Ole Mathiesen, Mathias Maagaard

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Haloperidol and delirium: what is next?Intensive care medicine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nina Christine Andersen-RanbergDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Zealand University Hospital, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600, Køge, Denmark. ncan@regionsjaelland.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0804-1064
Marija BarbateskovicCopenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8566-3660
Anders PernerCollaboration for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC), Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4668-0123
Marie Oxenbøll ColletCollaboration for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC), Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8387-3960
Lone Musaeus PoulsenDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Zealand University Hospital, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600, Køge, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7030-3395
Mathieu van der JagtDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2566-8325
Lisa SmitDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5199-930X
Jørn WetterslevCollaboration for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC), Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7778-1771
Ole MathiesenDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Zealand University Hospital, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600, Køge, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4544-0619
Mathias MaagaardDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Zealand University Hospital, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600, Køge, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9037-7295
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKErasmus MC · NLZealand University Hospital Køge · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHaloperidol is frequently used in critically ill patients with delirium, but evidence for its effects has been sparse and inconclusive. By including recent trials, we updated a systematic review assessing effects of haloperidol on mortality and serious adverse events in critically ill patients with delirium.

methodsThis is an updated systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised clinical trials investigating haloperidol versus placebo or any comparator in critically ill patients with delirium. We adhered to the Cochrane handbook, the PRISMA guidelines and the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation statements. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and proportion of patients with one or more serious adverse events or reactions (SAEs/SARs). Secondary outcomes were days alive without delirium or coma, delirium severity, cognitive function and health-related quality of life.

resultsWe included 11 RCTs with 15 comparisons (n = 2200); five were placebo-controlled. The relative risk for mortality with haloperidol versus placebo was 0.89; 96.7% CI 0.77 to 1.03; I

conclusionsHaloperidol may reduce mortality and likely result in little to no change in the occurrence of SAEs/SARs compared with placebo in critically ill patients with delirium. However, the results were not statistically significant and more trial data are needed to provide higher certainty for the effects of haloperidol in these patients.

trial registrationCRD42017081133, date of registration 28 November 2017.

Indexed as

DeliriumHaloperidolComaCritical IllnessHumansQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicHaloperidolAntipsychoticsDeliriumHaloperidolMeta-analysisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37633991
PMCPMC10463604
OpenAlexW4386190237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.