Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37633941›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2023

Impact of pension income on healthcare utilization of older adults in rural China.

Peizhe Yan, Fenghang Li, Stephen Nicholas, Elizabeth Maitland, Jialong Tan, Chen Chen, Jian Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Peizhe Yan *Dong Fureng Institute of Economic and Social Development, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.
Fenghang Li *Dong Fureng Institute of Economic and Social Development, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.
Stephen NicholasAustralian National Institute of Management and Commerce, Australian Technology Park, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Elizabeth MaitlandSchool of Management, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, England.
Jialong TanDong Fureng Institute of Economic and Social Development, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.
Chen ChenDepartment of Global Health, School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Hubei Province, 115 Donghu Road, Wuhan, 430079, China. chenchen835@whu.edu.cn.
Jian WangDong Fureng Institute of Economic and Social Development, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. wangjian993@whu.edu.cn.
Wuhan Donghu University · CNWuhan University · CNUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn China, rural residents experience poorer health conditions and a higher disease burden compared to urban residents but have lower healthcare services utilization. Rather than an insurance focus on enhanced healthcare services utilization, we aim to examine that whether an income shock, in the form of China's New Rural Pension Scheme (NRPS), will affect outpatient, inpatient and discretionary over-the-counter drug utilization by over 60-year-old rural NRPS residents.

methodsProviding a monthly pension of around RMB88 (USD12.97), NRPS covered all rural residents over 60 years old. Fuzzy regression discontinuity design (FRDD) was employed to explore the NRPS causal effect on healthcare services utilization, measured by outpatient and inpatient visits and discretionary over-the-counter drug purchases. The nationwide China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) 2018 provided the data.

resultsWithout significant changes in health status and medication needs, 60-plus-year-old NRPS recipients significantly increased the probability of discretionary OTC drug purchases by 33 percentage points. NRPS had no significant effect on the utilization of outpatient and inpatient utilization. The increase in the probability of discretionary OTC drug purchases from the NRPS income shock was concentrated in healthier and low-income rural residents. Robustness tests confirmed that FRDD was a robust estimation method and our results are robust.

conclusionNRPS was an exogenous income shock that significantly increased the probability of discretionary over-the-counter drug purchases among over 60-year-old rural residents, but not the utilization of inpatient or outpatient healthcare services. Income remains an important constraint for rural residents to improve their health. We recommend policymakers consider including commonly used over-the-counter drugs in basic health insurance reimbursements for rural residents; provide health advice for rural residents to make discretionary over-the-counter drug purchases; and to mount an information campaign on over-the-counter drug purchasing in order to increase the health awareness of rural residents.

Indexed as

IncomePatient Acceptance of Health CareAgedChinaHumansLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedPensionsHealthcare utilizationIncome shockNew Rural Pension SchemeOver-the-counter drugRural residents

Identifiers

PMID37633941
PMCPMC10463592
OpenAlexW4386191901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.