Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37633884›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2023

Cervical cancer screening and treatment for PLWHIV: experiences from an innovative program in Nigeria.

Olabanjo Okunlola Ogunsola, Oluseye Ayodele Ajayi, Temitope Olumuyiwa Ojo, Emmanuel Osayi, Kucheli Wudiri, Babatunde Amoo, Rita Ayoka-Ikechukwu, Olufemi Ojuola Olumeyan, Chukwuemeka Ifechelobi, Prosper Okonkwo and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cervical Lesion Evaluation in Females of Reproductive Age in Ondo Town, Nigeria.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Olabanjo Okunlola OgunsolaAPIN Public Health Initiatives, Abuja, Nigeria.
Oluseye Ayodele AjayiAPIN Public Health Initiatives, Abuja, Nigeria.
Temitope Olumuyiwa OjoDepartment of Community Health, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria. linktopeojo@yahoo.com.
Emmanuel OsayiAPIN Public Health Initiatives, Abuja, Nigeria.
Kucheli WudiriAPIN Public Health Initiatives, Abuja, Nigeria.
Babatunde AmooAPIN Public Health Initiatives, Abuja, Nigeria.
Rita Ayoka-IkechukwuAPIN Public Health Initiatives, Abuja, Nigeria.
Olufemi Ojuola OlumeyanAPIN Public Health Initiatives, Abuja, Nigeria.
Chukwuemeka IfechelobiAPIN Public Health Initiatives, Abuja, Nigeria.
Prosper OkonkwoAPIN Public Health Initiatives, Abuja, Nigeria.
Yewande AkinroAPIN Public Health Initiatives, Abuja, Nigeria.
AIDS Prevention Initiative in Nigeria · NGObafemi Awolowo University · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe evaluated cervical cancer program for women living with HIV (WLHIV) to determine program screening rate, primary case finder screening accuracy and treatment and post-treatment screening rate among screen-positive patients.

methodsA ten-month review of cervical cancer program data among WLHIV aged 15-49 years on HIV care across forty-one comprehensive ART sites, supported by APIN (a PEPFAR implementing partner) for cervical cancer screening and treatment in Nigeria, was conducted from October 2020 to July 2021. Initial screening was done using visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) followed by a gynaecologist expert review through a program-designed software named AVIVA, as a confirmatory test. Associations were measured between the primary case finder screening accuracy and study covariates at p-value of 0.05.

resultsAbout 10,289 asymptomatic women aged 15-49 years living with HIV were screened for cervical cancer by primary case finders using VIA-based screening test. About 732 (7.1%) had a positive screening test suggestive of precancerous lesions or cervical cancer. Three hundred and fifteen (43.0%) of VIA positive women had treatment using thermal ablation and less than one-third (21.6%) of those treated came back for post-treatment screening test. Primary case finder screening sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive accuracy using gynaecologist review as confirmatory test were 60.8%, 71.5%, 41.7% and 84.5% respectively. Overall screening accuracy was 68.8%. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS: This innovative approach to cervical cancer screening among WLHIV yielded modest results in preventing program error and wastages. Wider deployment of expert-based reviews of VIA though AVIVA software might be a veritable approach to improve screening accuracy in low resource settings.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAcetic AcidEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansNigeriaAcetic AcidCervical cancer screeningNigeriaWLHIV

Identifiers

PMID37633884
PMCPMC10463408
OpenAlexW4386191773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.