Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37633853›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2023

Patterns of Recurrence in Appendix Cancer After Complete Cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

Andrei Nikiforchin, Armando Sardi, Mary Caitlin King, Ekaterina Baron, Felipe Lopez-Ramirez, Luis Felipe Falla-Zuniga, Philipp Barakat, Sergei Iugai, Kathleen Pawlikowski, Carol Nieroda and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Andrei NikiforchinSurgical Oncology, The Institute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Armando SardiSurgical Oncology, The Institute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA. asardi@mdmercy.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4132-9489
Mary Caitlin KingSurgical Oncology, The Institute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ekaterina BaronSurgical Oncology, The Institute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Felipe Lopez-RamirezSurgical Oncology, The Institute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Luis Felipe Falla-ZunigaSurgical Oncology, The Institute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Philipp BarakatSurgical Oncology, The Institute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sergei IugaiSurgical Oncology, The Institute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kathleen PawlikowskiSurgical Oncology, The Institute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Carol NierodaSurgical Oncology, The Institute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Vadim GushchinSurgical Oncology, The Institute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is thought that low-grade (LG) appendiceal cancer (AC) demonstrates predominantly intraperitoneal recurrence (IPR) after cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC), whereas high-grade (HG) tumors progress both intra- and extraperitoneally (EPR). However, evidence supporting this conception is lacking; therefore, we assessed recurrence in various AC histologies.

methodsA retrospective, cohort study was conducted by using a single-center database (1998-2022). Recurrence patterns (IPR, EPR, combined) were identified for LG, HG, high-grade with signet ring cells (SRC), and goblet cell carcinoma (GCC).

resultsWe included 432 complete (CC-0/1) CRS/HIPECs: 200 LG, 114 HG, 72 SRC, and 46 GCC. Median follow-up was 78 (95% confidence interval [CI] 70-86) months. Overall, 34% (n = 148) of patients recurred. IPR was the most common (LG 16%, HG 27%, SRC 36%, GCC 26%) with median time to recurrence (MTR) of 21 (IQR: 12-40) months. EPR (liver, lung, pleura, lymph nodes, or bones) occurred in LG 3%, HG 9%, SRC 22%, and GCC 7%. MTR was 11 (IQR: 4-16) months. Combined pattern occurred in LG 0%, HG 8%, SRC 7%, and GCC 0%. MTR was 13 (IQR: 7-18) months. Iterative surgery was performed in 53% IPR, 18% EPR, and 51% combined. Median post-recurrence survival was longer after IPR compared with EPR and combined recurrence: 36 (95% CI 25-47) versus 13 (95% CI 7-19) and 18 (95% CI 6-30) months (p < 0.01).

conclusionsAfter complete CRS/HIPEC, IPR was the predominant pattern in all AC histologies and occurred later. Post-recurrence survival after IPR was longer. Knowing AC recurrence patterns can help to understand its biology and plan follow-up and post-relapse management.

Indexed as

Appendiceal NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Signet Ring CellCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresHyperthermic Intraperitoneal ChemotherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPeritoneal NeoplasmsAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.