Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37633279›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2023

Advanced variant classification framework reduces the false positive rate of predicted loss-of-function variants in population sequencing data.

Moriel Singer-Berk, Sanna Gudmundsson, Samantha Baxter, Eleanor G Seaby, Eleina England, Jordan C Wood, Rachel G Son, Nicholas A Watts, Konrad J Karczewski, Steven M Harrison and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. AAVC: An automated framework for high-accuracy ACMG-based variant classification.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Integrating 730,947 exome sequences with clinical literature improves gene discovery.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Loss of function of the chromatin remodeling geneProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Considerations for reporting variants in novel candidate genes identified during clinical genomic testing.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Comparison of the ABC and ACMG systems for variant classification.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Moriel Singer-BerkProgram in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA; Center for Genomic Medicine & Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Sanna GudmundssonProgram in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA; Center for Genomic Medicine & Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Gene Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Samantha BaxterProgram in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA; Center for Genomic Medicine & Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Eleanor G SeabyProgram in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA; Center for Genomic Medicine & Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Genomic Informatics Group, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Eleina EnglandProgram in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA; Center for Genomic Medicine & Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jordan C WoodProgram in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA; Center for Genomic Medicine & Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Rachel G SonProgram in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Nicholas A WattsProgram in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Konrad J KarczewskiProgram in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA; Center for Genomic Medicine & Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Steven M HarrisonProgram in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA; Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA.
Daniel G MacArthurProgram in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA; Centre for Population Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research and UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Centre for Population Genomics, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Heidi L RehmProgram in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA; Center for Genomic Medicine & Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Anne O'Donnell-LuriaProgram in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA; Center for Genomic Medicine & Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: odonnell@broadinstitute.org.

Funding

ClinGen AI Data Delivery SupplementU24HG006834 · NHGRI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI Marina DiStefano, CHRISTA LESE MARTIN · 2021 to 2026
$26.7M
The Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD)U24HG011450 · NHGRI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI Mark Joseph Daly, Konrad Karczewski · 2021 to 2026
$22.3M
Broad Institute Mendelian Genomic Research CenterU01HG011755 · NHGRI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI Anne O'Donnell-Luria, MICHAEL E TALKOWSKI · 2021 to 2026
$14.6M
Return of Genomic Results and Estimating Penetrance in Population-Based CohortsR01HL143295 · NHLBI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI CARSON, APRIL P, GREEN, ROBERT C. · 2019 to 2022
$7.2M
Annotation and interpretation of loss-of-function polymorphisms in human genomesR01GM104371 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MACARTHUR, DANIEL G · 2013 to 2016
$1.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG011755NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG006834NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG011450NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL143295NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104371
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicted loss of function (pLoF) variants are often highly deleterious and play an important role in disease biology, but many pLoF variants may not result in loss of function (LoF). Here we present a framework that advances interpretation of pLoF variants in research and clinical settings by considering three categories of LoF evasion: (1) predicted rescue by secondary sequence properties, (2) uncertain biological relevance, and (3) potential technical artifacts. We also provide recommendations on adjustments to ACMG/AMP guidelines' PVS1 criterion. Applying this framework to all high-confidence pLoF variants in 22 genes associated with autosomal-recessive disease from the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD v.2.1.1) revealed predicted LoF evasion or potential artifacts in 27.3% (304/1,113) of variants. The major reasons were location in the last exon, in a homopolymer repeat, in a low proportion expressed across transcripts (pext) scored region, or the presence of cryptic in-frame splice rescues. Variants predicted to evade LoF or to be potential artifacts were enriched for ClinVar benign variants. PVS1 was downgraded in 99.4% (162/163) of pLoF variants predicted as likely not LoF/not LoF, with 17.2% (28/163) downgraded as a result of our framework, adding to previous guidelines. Variant pathogenicity was affected (mostly from likely pathogenic to VUS) in 20 (71.4%) of these 28 variants. This framework guides assessment of pLoF variants beyond standard annotation pipelines and substantially reduces false positive rates, which is key to ensure accurate LoF variant prediction in both a research and clinical setting.

Indexed as

Inheritance PatternsExonsHumansUncertaintygnomADpLoFpopulation datapredicted loss-of-function variantsPVS1variant classificationvariant interpretation

Identifiers

PMID37633279
PMCPMC10502856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.