Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37632978›Full record

ArticleJMIR dermatology2023

Analyzing the Predictability of an Artificial Intelligence App (Tibot) in the Diagnosis of Dermatological Conditions: A Cross-sectional Study.

Shiva Shankar Marri, Arun C Inamadar, Ajit B Janagond, Warood Albadri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR dermatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shiva Shankar MarriDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Shri B M Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, BLDE (Deemed to be University), Vijayapur, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1798-2202
Arun C InamadarDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Shri B M Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, BLDE (Deemed to be University), Vijayapur, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8877-3723
Ajit B JanagondDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Shri B M Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, BLDE (Deemed to be University), Vijayapur, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4840-5352
Warood AlbadriDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Shri B M Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, BLDE (Deemed to be University), Vijayapur, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0796-1421

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) aims to create programs that reproduce human cognition and processes involved in interpreting complex data. Dermatology relies on morphological features and is ideal for applying AI image recognition for assisted diagnosis. Tibot is an AI app that analyzes skin conditions and works on the principle of a convolutional neural network. Appropriate research analyzing the accuracy of such apps is necessary.

objectiveThis study aims to analyze the predictability of the Tibot AI app in the identification of dermatological diseases as compared to a dermatologist.

methodsThis is a cross-sectional study. After taking informed consent, photographs of lesions of patients with different skin conditions were uploaded to the app. In every condition, the AI predicted three diagnoses based on probability, and these were compared with that by a dermatologist. The ability of the AI app to predict the actual diagnosis in the top one and top three anticipated diagnoses (prediction accuracy) was used to evaluate the app's effectiveness. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value were also used to assess the app's performance. Chi-square test was used to contrast categorical variables. P<.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsA total of 600 patients were included. Clinical conditions included alopecia, acne, eczema, immunological disorders, pigmentary disorders, psoriasis, infestation, tumors, and infections. In the anticipated top three diagnoses, the app's mean prediction accuracy was 96.1% (95% CI 94.3%-97.5%), while for the exact diagnosis, it was 80.6% (95% CI 77.2%-83.7%). The prediction accuracy (top one) for alopecia, acne, pigmentary disorders, and fungal infections was 97.7%, 91.7%, 88.5%, and 82.9%, respectively. Prediction accuracy (top three) for alopecia, eczema, and tumors was 100%. The sensitivity and specificity of the app were 97% (95% CI 95%-98%) and 98% (95% CI 98%-99%), respectively. There is a statistically significant association between clinical and AI-predicted diagnoses in all conditions (P<.001).

conclusionsThe AI app has shown promising results in diagnosing various dermatological conditions, and there is great potential for practical applicability.

Indexed as

AI-assisted diagnosisappapplicationartificial intelligencedeep learningdermatologymachine learningmobileneural network

Identifiers

PMID37632978
PMCPMC10335135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.