Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37632881›Full record

ArticleJMIR dermatology2022

Issues in Melanoma Detection: Semisupervised Deep Learning Algorithm Development via a Combination of Human and Artificial Intelligence.

Xinyuan Zhang, Ziqian Xie, Yang Xiang, Imran Baig, Mena Kozman, Carly Stender, Luca Giancardo, Cui Tao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xinyuan ZhangSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3519-7515
Ziqian XieSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6541-1773
Yang XiangSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1395-6805
Imran BaigMcGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9931-9147
Mena KozmanMcGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5143-3071
Carly StenderMcGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3064-757X
Luca GiancardoSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4862-2277
Cui TaoSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4267-1924

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAutomatic skin lesion recognition has shown to be effective in increasing access to reliable dermatology evaluation; however, most existing algorithms rely solely on images. Many diagnostic rules, including the 3-point checklist, are not considered by artificial intelligence algorithms, which comprise human knowledge and reflect the diagnosis process of human experts.

objectiveIn this paper, we aimed to develop a semisupervised model that can not only integrate the dermoscopic features and scoring rule from the 3-point checklist but also automate the feature-annotation process.

methodsWe first trained the semisupervised model on a small, annotated data set with disease and dermoscopic feature labels and tried to improve the classification accuracy by integrating the 3-point checklist using ranking loss function. We then used a large, unlabeled data set with only disease label to learn from the trained algorithm to automatically classify skin lesions and features.

resultsAfter adding the 3-point checklist to our model, its performance for melanoma classification improved from a mean of 0.8867 (SD 0.0191) to 0.8943 (SD 0.0115) under 5-fold cross-validation. The trained semisupervised model can automatically detect 3 dermoscopic features from the 3-point checklist, with best performances of 0.80 (area under the curve [AUC] 0.8380), 0.89 (AUC 0.9036), and 0.76 (AUC 0.8444), in some cases outperforming human annotators.

conclusionsOur proposed semisupervised learning framework can help with the automatic diagnosis of skin disease based on its ability to detect dermoscopic features and automate the label-annotation process. The framework can also help combine semantic knowledge with a computer algorithm to arrive at a more accurate and more interpretable diagnostic result, which can be applied to broader use cases.

Indexed as

3-point checklistalgorithmautomatic diagnosisdeep learningdermatologydermoscopic imagesmelanomamelanoma classificationsemisupervised learningskin diseaseskin lesion

Identifiers

PMID37632881
PMCPMC10334941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.