Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37632874›Full record

ArticleJMIR dermatology2022

The Experience of 3D Total-Body Photography to Monitor Nevi: Results From an Australian General Population-Based Cohort Study.

Caitlin Horsham, Montana O'Hara, Saira Sanjida, Samantha Ma, Dilki Jayasinghe, Adele C Green, Helmut Schaider, Joanne F Aitken, Richard A Sturm, Tarl Prow and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Caitlin Horsham *Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0354-3583
Montana O'Hara *Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1747-6609
Saira SanjidaCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4022-6920
Samantha MaCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7967-3341
Dilki JayasingheCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1467-7664
Adele C GreenCancer and Population Studies, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2753-4841
Helmut SchaiderDermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3195-2517
Joanne F AitkenViertel Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6859-2186
Richard A SturmDermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1301-0294
Tarl ProwFuture Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2892-6238
H Peter SoyerDermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4770-561X
Monika JandaCentre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1728-8085

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital 3D total-body photography of the skin surface is an emerging imaging modality that can facilitate the identification of new and changing nevi.

objectiveWe aimed to describe the experiences of study participants drawn from the general population who were provided 3D total-body photography and dermoscopy for the monitoring of nevi.

methodsA population-based prospective study of adults aged 20-70 years from South East Queensland, Australia was conducted. Participants underwent 3D total-body photography and dermoscopy every 6 months over a 3-year period. Participants were asked to provide closed and open-ended feedback on their 3D total-body photography and dermoscopy experience (eg, comfort, trust, intended future use, and willingness to pay) at the halfway study time point (18 months) and final study time point (36 months). We assessed changes in participants' reported experience of 3D total-body photography, and patient characteristics associated with patient experience at the end of the study (36 months) were analyzed.

resultsA total of 149 participants completed the surveys at both the 18- and 36-month time points (median age 55, range 23-70 years; n=94, 63.1% were male). At the 18-month time point, most participants (n=103, 69.1%) stated they completely trusted 3D total-body imaging for the diagnosis and monitoring of their nevi, and this did not change at the 36-month (n=104, 69.8%) time point. The majority of participants reported that they were very comfortable or comfortable with the technology at both the 18- (n=138, 92.6%) and 36-month (n=140, 94%) time points, respectively; albeit, the number of participants reporting that they were very comfortable reduced significantly between the 18- and 36-month time points, from 71.1% (n=106) to 61.1% (n=91; P=.01). Almost all participants (n=140, 94%) would consider using this technology if it were to become commercially available, and this did not change during the two study time points. Half of the participants (n=74) cited barriers to participating in 3D total-body photography, including trust in the ability of this technology to detect and monitor suspicious lesions, digital privacy, cost, and travel requirements.

conclusionsThe majority of participants expressed positive attitudes toward 3D total-body photography for the monitoring of their moles. Half of the participants identified potential barriers to uptake.

Indexed as

3D total-body photographyartificial intelligencecohort studyearly detectionmelanocytic nevimelanomamolesskinskin cancerskin surface

Identifiers

PMID37632874
PMCPMC10334884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.