Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37632862›Full record

ArticleJMIR dermatology2022

Crowdsourcing Medical Costs in Dermatology: Cross-sectional Study Analyzing Dermatologic GoFundMe Campaigns.

Erica Mark, Mira Sridharan, Brian Florenzo, Olivia L Schenck, Mary-Margaret B Noland, John S Barbieri, Jules B Lipoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. GoFundMe®: Crowdfunding Among Young Adult Patients With Cancer.Clinical journal of oncology nursing · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Erica MarkDepartment of Dermatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2578-082X
Mira SridharanDepartment of Dermatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2216-5095
Brian FlorenzoDepartment of Dermatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2177-1499
Olivia L SchenckDepartment of Dermatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4436-3586
Mary-Margaret B NolandDepartment of Dermatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8831-2353
John S BarbieriDepartment of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5467-4102
Jules B LipoffDepartment of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0557-4260

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCrowdfunding for medical costs is becoming increasingly popular. Few previous studies have described the fundraising characteristics and qualities associated with success.

objectiveThis study aimed to characterize and investigate the qualities associated with successful dermatological fundraisers.

methodsThis cross-sectional study of dermatological GoFundMe campaigns collected data, including demographic variables, thematic variables using an inductive qualitative method, and quantitative information. Linear regression examined the qualities associated with success, which are defined based on funds raised when controlling for campaign goals. Logistic regression was used to examine qualities associated with extremely successful campaigns, defined as those raising >1.5 times the IQR. Statistical significance was set at P<.05.

resultsA total of 2008 publicly available campaigns at the time of data collection were evaluated. Nonmodifiable factors associated with greater success included male gender, age 20-40 years, and White race. Modifiable factors associated with success included more updates posted to the campaign page, non-self-identity of the campaign creator, mention of a chronic condition, and smiling in campaign profile photographs.

conclusionsUnderstanding the modifiable factors of medical crowdfunding may inform future campaigns, and nonmodifiable factors may have policy implications for improving health care equity and financing. Crowdfunding for medical disease treatment may have potential implications for medical privacy and exacerbation of existing health care disparities. This study was limited to publicly available GoFundMe campaigns. Potential limitations for this study include intercoder variability, misclassification bias because of the data abstraction process, and prioritization of campaigns based on the proprietary GoFundMe algorithm.

Indexed as

crowdfundingcrowdsourcingfinancial burdenfundraisingGoFundMehealth equitymedical expensessocial media

Identifiers

PMID37632862
PMCPMC10334893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.