ArticleJMIR dermatology2021
Development of an mHealth App for Patients With Psoriasis Undergoing Biological Treatment: Participatory Design Study.
Article in JMIR dermatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Smartphone Applications in Dermatology With Special Focus on AI: A European-Continent-Based Review.International journal of dermatology · 2026Review
- Workshops as a Research Method in Health Science: Epistemological and Methodological Perspectives.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the ALIBIRD mHealth Platform for Care of Patients With Lung Cancer: Prospective Pilot Study.JMIR cancer · 2026Article
- Solutions to Enhance Oral Care Among Hospitalised Patients: A Participatory Design Process Developed Jointly by Patients and Healthcare Professionals.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2025Article
- Development of an mHealth Solution for Tailored Communication Between Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Health Care Professionals: Participatory Design Study.Journal of participatory medicine · 2025Article
- Dietary patterns and psoriasis severity in Thai patients: a machine learning approach for small sample data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Epistemological aspects of participatory design studies conducted in the field of health science.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Article
- Article
- Developing an mHealth App for Empowering Cancer Survivors With Disabilities: Co-design Study.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- A German Smartphone-Based Self-management Tool for Psoriasis: Community-Driven Development and Evaluation of Quality-of-Life Effects.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- Telemedicine and e-Health in the Management of Psoriasis: Improving Patient Outcomes - A Narrative Review.Psoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Review
- An mHealth App to Support Patients With Psoriasis in Relation to Follow-up Consultations: Qualitative Study.JMIR dermatology · 2021Article
- Article
- Development of a health information system to promote emergency care pathways: A participatory design study.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Denmark, patients with psoriasis undergoing biological treatment have regular follow-ups, typically every 3 months. This may pose a challenge for patients who live far away from the hospital. Mobile health (mHealth) is a promising and reliable tool for the long-term management of patients with psoriasis undergoing biological treatment because the disease course can be properly monitored. Despite recent developments in mHealth, the full potential of teledermatology remains to be tapped by newer, more attractive forms of services focused on patients' needs.
objectiveThis study aims to design and develop an mHealth app to support the self-management of patients with psoriasis using a participatory design.
methodsUsing participatory design, we conducted 1 future workshop, 4 mock-up workshops, and 1 prototype test with patients and health care professionals to co-design a prototype. The process was iterative to ensure that all stakeholders would provide input into the design and outcome; this approach enabled continuous revision of the prototype until an acceptable solution was agreed upon. Data were analyzed according to the steps-plan, act, observe, and reflect-in the methodology of participatory design.
resultsHealth care professionals and patients emphasized the importance of a more patient-centered approach, focusing on the communication and maintenance of relationships. Patients perceived consultations to be impersonal and repetitive and wanted the opportunity to contribute to the agenda while attending a consultation. Patients also stated they would prefer not to attend visits in person every 3 months. On the basis of these findings, we designed an mHealth app that could replace in-person visits and support patients at in-person visits. Video consultations, self-monitoring, and registration of patient-reported outcome data were embedded in the app.
conclusionsUsing participatory design facilitated mutual learning and democratic processes that gave end users a significant influence over the solution. Despite the advantages of using participatory design in developing mHealth solutions, organizational conditions may still represent a barrier to the optimization of solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.