Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37632687›Full record

ArticleBiological trace element research2024

Severe Disease Burden and the Mitigation Strategy in the Arsenic-Exposed Population of Kaliprasad Village in Bhagalpur District of Bihar, India.

Arun Kumar, Kanhaiya Kumar, Mohammad Ali, Vivek Raj, Abhinav Srivastava, Manishankar Kumar, Pintoo Kumar Niraj, Mukesh Kumar, Rishav Kumar, Dhruv Kumar and 7 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biological trace element research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Arun KumarMahavir Cancer Sansthan and Research Centre, Patna, Bihar, 801505, India. drarunk31@gmail.com.
Kanhaiya KumarMahavir Cancer Sansthan and Research Centre, Patna, Bihar, 801505, India.
Mohammad AliMahavir Cancer Sansthan and Research Centre, Patna, Bihar, 801505, India.
Vivek RajPatna Women's College, Patna, Bihar, India.
Abhinav SrivastavaMahavir Cancer Sansthan and Research Centre, Patna, Bihar, 801505, India.
Manishankar KumarUPES University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Pintoo Kumar NirajMahavir Cancer Sansthan and Research Centre, Patna, Bihar, 801505, India.
Mukesh KumarMahavir Cancer Sansthan and Research Centre, Patna, Bihar, 801505, India.
Rishav KumarMahavir Cancer Sansthan and Research Centre, Patna, Bihar, 801505, India.
Dhruv KumarUPES University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Akhouri BishwapriyaGeological Survey of India, Patna, Bihar, India.
Ranjit KumarCentral University of Himachal Pradesh, Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Suresh KumarSido Kanhu Murmu University, Dumka, Jharkhand, India.
Gautam AnandCentral Ground Water Board, Patna, Bihar, India.
Santosh KumarTu Delft, Delft, Netherlands.
Maiko SakamotoUniversity of Tokyo, Chiba, Japan.
Ashok Kumar GhoshMahavir Cancer Sansthan and Research Centre, Patna, Bihar, 801505, India.
Mahavir Cancer Institute and Research Centre · INUniversity of Petroleum and Energy Studies · INDelft University of Technology · NLCentral Ground Water Board · INGeological Survey of India · INPatna University · INThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study was carried out in the village Kaliprasad of Bhagalpur district of Bihar to know the arsenic exposure effect in the exposed population. A total of n = 102 households were studied, and their water and biological samples such as urine and hair were collected and analyzed in a graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrophotometer (GF-AAS). The assessment of arsenic-exposed village population reveals that the villagers were suffering from serious health-related problems such as skin manifestations (hyperkeratosis and melanosis in their palm and soles), breathlessness, general body weakness, mental disorders, diabetes, hypertension (raised blood pressure), hormonal imbalance, neurological disorders, and few cancer cases. About 77% of household hand pump water had arsenic level more than the WHO recommended level of 10 µg/L, with highest level of 523 µg/L. Moreover, in 60% individual's urine samples, arsenic concentration was very high with maximum 374 µg/L while in hair 64% individuals had arsenic concentration above the permissible limit with maximum arsenic concentration of 11,398 µg/kg. The hazard quotient (HQ) was also calculated to know the arsenic risk percentage in children as 87.11%, in females as 83.15%, and in males as 82.27% by groundwater. This has surpassed the threshold value of

Indexed as

ArsenicArsenic PoisoningGroundwaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalChildFemaleHumansIndiaMalePopulation GroupsWaterArsenicWaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalCancer risk assessmentGroundwater arsenic contaminationKaliprasad villagePublic health assessment

Identifiers

PMID37632687
OpenAlexW4386195923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.