Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37632664›Full record

ArticleSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2024

Appraising the Methodological Quality of Sports Injury Video Analysis Studies: The QA-SIVAS Scale.

Tim Hoenig, Lina Rahlf, Jan Wilke, Inga Krauß, Dimitris Dalos, Steffen Willwacher, Patrick Mai, Karsten Hollander, Dominik Fohrmann, Tron Krosshaug and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tim HoenigDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8287-6625
Lina RahlfDepartment of Exercise Physiology, Institute of Sports Science, Europa-Universität Flensburg, Flensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7498-6816
Jan WilkeDepartment of Movement Sciences, University of Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9147-2369
Inga KraußDepartment of Sports Medicine, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6818-6276
Dimitris DalosDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4055-8856
Steffen WillwacherInstitute for Advanced Biomechanics and Motion Studies, Offenburg University of Applied Sciences, Offenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1303-3165
Patrick MaiInstitute for Advanced Biomechanics and Motion Studies, Offenburg University of Applied Sciences, Offenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7076-651X
Karsten HollanderInstitute of Interdisciplinary Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, MSH Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5682-9665
Dominik FohrmannInstitute of Interdisciplinary Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, MSH Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0032-9936
Tron KrosshaugDepartment of Sports Medicine, Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9223-3386
Thomas GronwaldInstitute of Interdisciplinary Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, MSH Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany. thomas.gronwald@medicalschool-hamburg.de.ORCID 0000-0001-5610-6013

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVideo analysis (VA) is commonly used in the assessment of sports injuries and has received considerable research interest. Until now, no tool has been available for the assessment of study quality. Therefore, the objective of this study was to develop and evaluate a valid instrument that reliably assesses the methodological quality of VA studies.

methodsThe Quality Appraisal for Sports Injury Video Analysis Studies (QA-SIVAS) scale was developed using a modified Delphi approach including expert consensus and pilot testing. Reliability was examined through intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC

resultsThe QA-SIVAS scale consists of an 18-item checklist addressing the study design, data source, conduct, report, and discussion of VA studies in sports injury research. Inter- and intra-rater reliability were excellent with ICCs > 0.97. Expert ratings revealed a high construct validity (0.71; p < 0.001). Mean rating time was 10 ± 2 min per article.

conclusionQA-SIVAS is a reliable and valid instrument that can be easily applied to sports injury research. Future studies in the field of VA should adhere to standardized methodological criteria and strict quality guidelines.

Indexed as

Athletic InjuriesChecklistHumansReproducibility of ResultsResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID37632664
PMCPMC10799118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.