ArticleMolecular diagnosis & therapy2023
Personalized Cancer Monitoring Assay for the Detection of ctDNA in Patients with Solid Tumors.
Article in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Pretreatment and on-treatment ctDNA and tissue biomarkers predict recurrence in patients with stage IIIB-D/IV melanoma treated with adjuvant immunotherapy: CheckMate 915.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Trial
- [Guideline development for MRD diagnostics in AML as a blueprint for solid tumors].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Enrichment of mutated DNA enables ultra-sensitive ctDNA detection in NSCLC using shallow targeted sequencing.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Circulating tumor DNA in neoadjuvant therapy for solid tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Liquid biopsy biomarkers for cancer detection, treatment monitoring, and clinical outcome prediction.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Generic Protocols for Analytical Validation of Tumor-Informed Circulating Tumor DNA Assays for Molecular Residual Disease: The Blood Profiling Atlas in Cancer's Molecular Residual Disease Analytical Validation Working Group Consensus Recommendation.JCO precision oncology · 2026Article
- Facile solid-liquid biphasic PCR platform for ultrasensitive multiplex detection and genotyping of HPV.Mikrochimica acta · 2025Article
- Personalized and Tumor Informed Circulating Tumor DNA Assay for Molecular Residual Disease Monitoring of Solid Malignancies.MedComm · 2025Article
- From residual risk to precision intervention: the evolving role of minimal residual disease in breast cancer management.Cancer biology & medicine · 2025Review
- Enspyre: a novel enrichment technology for selected DNA variants using pyrophosphorolysis.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- GeneBits: ultra-sensitive tumour-informed ctDNA monitoring of treatment response and relapse in cancer patients.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Longitudinal monitoring of circulating tumor DNA to detect relapse early and predict outcome in early breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Minimal residue disease detection in early-stage breast cancer: a review.Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
- Ultrasensitive ctDNA detection for preoperative disease stratification in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma.Nature medicine · 2025Article
- Multi-analyte liquid biopsy approaches for early detection of esophageal cancer: the expanding role of ctDNA.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Early Detection, Precision Treatment, Recurrence Monitoring: Liquid Biopsy Transforms Colorectal Cancer Therapy.Current cancer drug targets · 2025Review
- Recent advances in ctDNA detection using electrochemical biosensor for cancer.Discover oncology · 2024Review
- Optimizing ctDNA: An Updated Review of a Promising Clinical Tool for the Management of Uveal Melanoma.Cancers · 2024Review
- Ultra-sensitive molecular residual disease detection through whole genome sequencing with single-read error correction.EMBO molecular medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHighly sensitive molecular assays have been developed to detect plasma-based circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and emerging evidence suggests their clinical utility for monitoring minimal residual disease and recurrent disease, providing prognostic information, and monitoring therapy responses in patients with solid tumors. The Invitae Personalized Cancer Monitoring
methodsThe assay's tumor whole exome sequencing and ctDNA detection components were analytically validated using 250 unique human specimens and nine commercial reference samples that generated 1349 whole exome sequencing and cell-free DNA (cfDNA)-derived libraries. A comparison of tumor and germline whole exome sequencing was used to identify patient-specific tumor variant signatures and generate patient-specific panels, followed by targeted next-generation sequencing of plasma-derived cfDNA using the patient-specific panels with anchored multiplex polymerase chain reaction chemistry leveraging unique molecular identifiers.
resultsWhole exome sequencing resulted in overall sensitivity of 99.8% and specificity of > 99.9%. Patient-specific panels were successfully designed for all 63 samples (100%) with ≥ 20% tumor content and 24 (80%) of 30 samples with ≥ 10% tumor content. Limit of blank studies using 30 histologically normal, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens resulted in 100% expected panel design failure. The ctDNA detection component demonstrated specificity of > 99.9% and sensitivity of 96.3% for a combination of 10 ng of cfDNA input, 0.008% allele frequency, 50 variants on the patient-specific panels, and a baseline threshold. Limit of detection ranged from 0.008% allele frequency when utilizing 60 ng of cfDNA input with 18-50 variants in the patient-specific panels (> 99.9% sensitivity) with a baseline threshold, to 0.05% allele frequency when using 10 ng of cfDNA input with an 18-variant panel with a monitoring threshold (> 99.9% sensitivity).
conclusionsThe Invitae Personalized Cancer Monitoring assay, featuring a flexible patient-specific panel design with 18-50 variants, demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for detecting ctDNA at variant allele frequencies as low as 0.008%. This assay may support patient prognostic stratification, provide real-time data on therapy responses, and enable early detection of residual/recurrent disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.