Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37632544›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2023

Fate of Cryptosporidium and Giardia through conventional and compact drinking water treatment plants.

Ahmed S Moussa, Ameen A Ashour, Mohammad I Soliman, Hoda A Taha, Ahmad Z Al-Herrawy, Mahmoud Gad

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. WaterborneJournal of water and health · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Analysis of Reported Cases ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  9. Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ahmed S MoussaReference Laboratory, Drinking Water and Wastewater Holding Company, Cairo, Egypt.
Ameen A AshourZoology Department, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohammad I SolimanZoology Department, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Hoda A TahaZoology Department, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Ahmad Z Al-HerrawyEnvironmental Parasitology Laboratory, Water Pollution Research Department, National Research Centre, 12622, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.
Mahmoud GadEnvironmental Parasitology Laboratory, Water Pollution Research Department, National Research Centre, 12622, Dokki, Giza, Egypt. mi.saleh@nrc.sci.eg.
Ain Shams University · EGNational Research Centre · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past three decades, a notable rise in the occurrence of enteric protozoan pathogens, especially Giardia and Cryptosporidium spp., in drinking water sources has been observed. This rise could be attributed not only to an actual increase in water contamination but also to improvements in detection methods. These waterborne pathogens have played a pivotal role in disease outbreaks and the overall escalation of disease rates in both developed and developing nations worldwide. Consequently, the control of waterborne diseases has become a vital component of public health policies and a primary objective of drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs). Limited studies applied real-time PCR (qPCR) and/or immunofluorescence assay (IFA) for monitoring Giardia and Cryptosporidium spp., particularly in developing countries like Egypt. Water samples from two conventional drinking water treatment plants and two compact units (CUs) were analyzed using both IFA and qPCR methods to detect Giardia and Cryptosporidium. Using qPCR and IFA, the conventional DWTPs showed complete removal of Giardia and Cryptosporidium, whereas Mansheyat Alqanater and Niklah CUs achieved only partial removal. Specifically, Cryptosporidium gene copies removal rates were 33.33% and 60% for Mansheyat Alqanater and Niklah CUs, respectively. Niklah CU also removed 50% of Giardia gene copies, but no Giardia gene copies were removed by Mansheyat Alqanater CU. Using IFA, both Mansheyat Alqanater and Niklah CUs showed a similar removal rate of 50% for Giardia cysts. Additionally, Niklah CU achieved a 50% removal of Cryptosporidium oocysts, whereas Mansheyat Alqanater CU did not show any removal of Cryptosporidium oocysts. Conventional DWTPs were more effective than CUs in removing enteric protozoa. The contamination of drinking water by enteric pathogenic protozoa remains a significant issue globally, leading to increased disease rates. Infectious disease surveillance in drinking water is an important epidemiological tool to monitor the health of a population.

Indexed as

CryptosporidiosisCryptosporidiumDrinking WaterGiardiasisWater PurificationAnimalsGiardiaHumansOocystsDrinking WaterDrinking water treatment plantsEnteric protozoa parasitesModern techniques

Identifiers

PMID37632544
PMCPMC10567834
OpenAlexW4386193777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.