Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37632535›Full record

SynthesisExperimental brain research2023

Ocular microtremor: a structured review.

Lisa Graham, Julia Das, Rodrigo Vitorio, Claire McDonald, Richard Walker, Alan Godfrey, Rosie Morris, Samuel Stuart

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Experimental brain research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lisa GrahamDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Julia DasDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Rodrigo VitorioDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Claire McDonaldGateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust, Gateshead, UK.
Richard WalkerNorthumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Shields, UK.
Alan GodfreyDepartment of Computer and Information Science, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Rosie MorrisDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Samuel StuartDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. samuel2.stuart@northumbria.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6846-9372
Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust · GBNorthumbria University · GBGateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Parkinson's Disease Foundation PF-CRA-2073Parkinson's Disease Foundation PF-FBS-1898
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ocular microtremor (OMT) is the smallest of three involuntary fixational micro eye movements, which has led to it being under researched in comparison. The link between OMT and brain function generates a strong rationale for further study as there is potential for its use as a biomarker in populations with neurological injury and disease. This structured review focused on populations previously studied, instrumentation used for measurement, commonly reported OMT outcomes, and recommendations concerning protocol design and future studies. Current methods of quantifying OMT will be reviewed to analyze their efficacy and efficiency and guide potential development and understanding of novel techniques. Electronic databases were systematically searched and compared with predetermined inclusion criteria. 216 articles were identified in the search and screened by two reviewers. 16 articles were included for review. Findings showed that piezoelectric probe is the most common method of measuring OMT, with fewer studies involving non-invasive approaches, such as contact lenses and laser imaging. OMT frequency was seen to be reduced during general anesthesia at loss of consciousness and in neurologically impaired participants when compared to healthy adults. We identified the need for a non-invasive technique for measuring OMT and highlight its potential in clinical applications as an objective biomarker for neurological assessments. We highlight the need for further research on the clinical validation of OMT to establish its potential to identify or predict a meaningful clinical or functional state, specifically, regarding accuracy, precision, and reliability of OMT.

Indexed as

EyeFaceAdultConsciousnessHumansReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkerEye movementsNeurological diseaseNeurological injuryOcular microtremor

Identifiers

PMID37632535
PMCPMC10471653
OpenAlexW4386190998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.