Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37632533›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2023

Clinicopathologic features and prognostic significance of mixed (Low and high-grade) papillary urothelial carcinoma comparison with low and high-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma.

Gozde Kir, Gozde Ecem Cecikoglu, Cumhur Selcuk Topal, Muhammet Huseyin Sorkun, Meftun Culpan, Ferhat Yakup Suceken, Hakan Karaca, Asif Yildirim

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Can We Foresee Grade and Stage Progression in Mixed Low- and High-Grade Noninvasive Papillary Urothelial Carcinomas?APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gozde KirPathology Department, Medeniyet University Goztepe Prof. Dr. Suleyman Yalcin City Hospital, Dr.Erkin Caddesi, Göztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçın Şehir Hastanesi, Patoloji Laboratuarı, 34720, Kadıköy, Istanbul, Turkey. gozkir@yahoo.com.
Gozde Ecem CecikogluPathology Department, Istanbul Medeniyet University Goztepe Prof. Dr. Suleyman Yalcin City Hospital, Fahrettin Kerim Gökay Caddesi, 34722, Kadıköy, Istanbul, Turkey.
Cumhur Selcuk TopalPathology Department, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Elmalıkent Mahallesi, Adem Yavuz Cad. No:1, 34764, Ümraniye, Istanbul, Turkey.
Muhammet Huseyin SorkunIstanbul Medeniyet University, Dumlupınar D100 No: 98, 34720, Kadıköy, Istanbul, Turkey.
Meftun CulpanUrology Department, Istanbul Medeniyet University Prof. Dr. Suleyman Yalcin City Hospital, Fahrettin Kerim Gökay Caddesi, Göztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçın Şehir Hastanesi Patoloji Laboratuvarı, 34722, Kadıköy, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ferhat Yakup SucekenUrology Department, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Elmalıkent Mahallesi, Adem Yavuz Cad. No:1, 34764, Ümraniye, Istanbul, Turkey.
Hakan KaracaUrology Department, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Elmalıkent Mahallesi, Adem Yavuz Cad. No:1, 34764, Ümraniye, Istanbul, Turkey.
Asif YildirimUrology Department, Istanbul Medeniyet University Prof. Dr. Suleyman Yalcin City Hospital, Fahrettin Kerim Gökay Caddesi, Göztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçın Şehir Hastanesi Patoloji Laboratuvarı, 34722, Kadıköy, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology (2022 WHO/ISUP) classification categorizes noninvasive carcinomas based on the highest grade observed in a pathology sample. According to this classification, a lesion is classified as mixed-grade (MG) if the highest-grade component comprises less than 5% high-grade (HG) carcinoma [14]. This study included 160 cases of low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma (LGUC) and 160 cases of HG papillary urothelial carcinoma (HGUC), selected randomly. In addition, 160 consecutive and unselected cases of MG papillary urothelial carcinoma (MGUC) were obtained from all bladder transurethral resection specimens diagnosed with papillary urothelial carcinoma between January 2007 and January 2021. The results of the multivariate analysis showed that histologic grade, invasion of the lamina propria, and the presence of carcinoma in situ at presentation were independent prognostic parameters regarding recurrence-free survival (p = 0.002; hazard ratio (HR) = 1.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.059-1.956, p = 0.02; and HR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.159-2.684, p = 0.008, respectively). Histologic grade was the only independent prognostic parameter of disease-specific survival (DSS) (p < 0.001). Comparisons between non-muscle invasive (NMI) MGUC and NMI LGUC, as well as between NMI MGUC and NMI HGUC, revealed statistically significant differences in terms of DSS (HR = 0.07, 95% CI = 0.024-0.252, p < 0.001 and HR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.023-2.460, p = 0.039, respectively). Our study findings demonstrate statistically significant differences regarding DSS between NMI MGUC and NMI HGUC, as well as between NMI MGUC and NMI LGUC. Therefore, we suggested that considering the presence of less than 5% MGUC as a separate category may be appropriate. However, it is important to validate our results in larger cohorts with longer follow-up periods to establish the clinical significance of MGUC and provide guidance for patient management.

Indexed as

Carcinoma in SituCarcinoma, PapillaryCarcinoma, Transitional CellUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsCystectomyHumansPrognosisHigh-gradeLow-gradeMixed-gradeSurvivalUrothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.