Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37632486›Full record

ReviewMayo Clinic proceedings2023

An Environmental Scan of Consumer-Initiated Germline Genetic Testing for Health Risks.

Hannah G Kirby, Heidi L Rehm, Leland E Hull

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hannah G KirbyBoston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Heidi L RehmCenter for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Medical and Population Genetics, The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Leland E HullDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Medical and Population Genetics, The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA. Electronic address: Lhull1@mgh.harvard.edu.

Funding

Elucidating the barriers and facilitators to widespread implementation of preconception genetic carrier screeningK08HG012221 · NHGRI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HULL, LELAND · 2022 to 2025
$883k
NHGRI NIH HHS K08 HG012221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As patient access to laboratory testing outside the clinic grows, health care providers can expect to confront increasing questions about the utility and interpretation of consumer-initiated genetic testing for health risks. We sought to characterize the marketplace diversity of consumer-initiated germline genetic testing options. An environmental scan was conducted to identify germline genetic testing companies that offer testing for at least one diagnosable health condition and are available for purchase by consumers in the US market without a visit to one's health care provider. We limited our scope to tests available between October 1, 2019, and September 30, 2021. We characterized variability in the content and processes used by 21 companies offering 74 distinct test products that met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. A minority (8 of 21 companies) offered tests that assessed the presence of at least 1 US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Tier 1 condition for which detection can impact an individual's clinical care and for which evidence-based guidelines for detection and management exist.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingSelf-TestingHumans

Identifiers

PMID37632486
PMCPMC10593045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.