ArticleExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2023
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the mechanism of action, and other considerations for cell-based therapy candidates.
Article in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of Biomimetic Substrates for Limbal Epithelial Stem Cells Using Collagen-Based Films, Hyaluronic Acid, Immortalized Cells, and Macromolecular Crowding.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Bioengineering breakthroughs: The impact of stem cell models on advanced therapy medicinal product development.World journal of stem cells · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The focus of this Commentary is to introduce cell-based therapy in the context of how I believe the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) might establish criteria for the approval of clinical trials that could eventually lead to the final marketplace approval of these medically relevant, cell-based therapeutic products. It is important to emphasize that regulatory agencies have set up practices and procedures that are based on many years of evaluating pharmaceutically provided drugs. To consider cell-based therapies as single action drugs is inappropriate given the complexity of this technology. The regulatory agencies have been slowly reevaluating the criteria by which they allow clinical trials using cell-based therapies to proceed. This commentary focuses on a few key aspects of such considerations and provides suggestions for modifying the standard criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.