Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37632437›Full record

Trial reportEuropean heart journal2023

Upgrade of right ventricular pacing to cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure: a randomized trial.

Béla Merkely, Robert Hatala, Jerzy K Wranicz, Gábor Duray, Csaba Földesi, Zoltán Som, Marianna Németh, Kinga Goscinska-Bis, László Gellér, Endre Zima and 11 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in European heart journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06241651 (Conduction System Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing for Heart Failure Patients With Right Ventricular Pacing Upgraded to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
15.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06241651 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Conduction System Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing for Heart Failure Patients With Right Ventricular Pacing Upgraded to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: a Prospective Multicenter Non-inferiority Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical UniversityRan2024 to 2027Enrolled66ConditionsConduction System Pacing, Biventricular Pacing, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, Right Ventricular PacingArmsConduction system pacing, Biventricular pacing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Time-trend treatment effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without defibrillator on mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Benefits of upgrading right ventricular to biventricular pacing in heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Predictors of echocardiographic response in the Budapest-CRT upgrade trial.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cardiac implantable electronic device upgrades and downgrades: a Clinical Consensus Statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Association (APHRS), Canadian Heart Rhythm Society (CHRS), Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS).Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Béla MerkelyHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Varosmajor 68, H-1122 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-6514-0723
Robert HatalaDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases and Slovak Medical University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Jerzy K WraniczDepartment of Electrocardiology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Gábor DurayDepartment of Cardiology, Central Hospital of Northern Pest-Military Hospital, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-1286-6576
Csaba FöldesiGottsegen National Cardiovascular Center, Budapest, Hungary.
Zoltán SomGottsegen National Cardiovascular Center, Budapest, Hungary.
Marianna NémethHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Varosmajor 68, H-1122 Budapest, Hungary.
Kinga Goscinska-BisDepartment of Electrocardiology and Heart Failure, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
László GellérHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Varosmajor 68, H-1122 Budapest, Hungary.
Endre ZimaHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Varosmajor 68, H-1122 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-5132-6009
István OsztheimerHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Varosmajor 68, H-1122 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-8209-990X
Levente MolnárHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Varosmajor 68, H-1122 Budapest, Hungary.
Júlia KarádyHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Varosmajor 68, H-1122 Budapest, Hungary.
Gerhard HindricksDepartment of Cardiology and Electrophysiology, German Heart Center of the Charite Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ilan GoldenbergClinical Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5806-3325
Helmut KleinClinical Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Mátyás SzigetiHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Varosmajor 68, H-1122 Budapest, Hungary.
Scott D SolomonCardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3698-9597
Valentina KutyifaHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Varosmajor 68, H-1122 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-0016-289X
Attila KovácsHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Varosmajor 68, H-1122 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-2320-6434
Annamária KosztinHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Varosmajor 68, H-1122 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-6647-2623
Semmelweis University · HUGottsegen National Cardiovascular Center · HUUniversity of Rochester · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEMedical University of Lodz · PLMedical University of Silesia · PLSlovak Medical University · SK

Funding

Boston ScientificEuropean UnionNational Heart Program NVKP_16-1-2016-0017National Research Development and Innovation Fund of Hungary NVKP_16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsDe novo implanted cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) reduces the risk of morbidity and mortality in patients with left bundle branch block, heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, among HFrEF patients with right ventricular pacing (RVP), the efficacy of CRT-D upgrade is uncertain.

methodsIn this multicentre, randomized, controlled trial, 360 symptomatic (New York Heart Association Classes II-IVa) HFrEF patients with a pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), high RVP burden ≥ 20%, and a wide paced QRS complex duration ≥ 150 ms were randomly assigned to receive CRT-D upgrade (n = 215) or ICD (n = 145) in a 3:2 ratio. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, or <15% reduction of left ventricular end-systolic volume assessed at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization.

resultsOver a median follow-up of 12.4 months, the primary outcome occurred in 58/179 (32.4%) in the CRT-D arm vs. 101/128 (78.9%) in the ICD arm (odds ratio 0.11; 95% confidence interval 0.06-0.19; P < .001). All-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization occurred in 22/215 (10%) in the CRT-D arm vs. 46/145 (32%) in the ICD arm (hazard ratio 0.27; 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.47; P < .001). The incidence of procedure- or device-related complications was similar between the two arms [CRT-D group 25/211 (12.3%) vs. ICD group 11/142 (7.8%)].

conclusionsIn pacemaker or ICD patients with significant RVP burden and reduced ejection fraction, upgrade to CRT-D compared with ICD therapy reduced the combined risk of all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, or absence of reverse remodelling.

Indexed as

Cardiac Resynchronization TherapyDefibrillators, ImplantableHeart FailureStroke VolumeAgedFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeCardiac resynchronization therapyHeart failurePacing-induced cardiomyopathyRight ventricular pacingUpgrade

Identifiers

PMID37632437
PMCPMC10590127
OpenAlexW4386191544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.