Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37632240›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational allergy2023

Anaphylaxis management in a French pediatric emergency department: Lessons from the ANA-PED study.

Evangéline Clark, Luciana Kase Tanno, Tram Vo, Brigitte Blanc, Pascal Demoly, Davide Caimmi

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational allergy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05112367 (Retrospective Study on the Management of Pediatric Anaphylaxis and Clinical Signs of Allergy in the Pediatric Emergency Department of Montpellier University Hospital), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05112367 unknown statusnot on this map

Retrospective Study on the Management of Pediatric Anaphylaxis and Clinical Signs of Allergy in the Pediatric Emergency Department of Montpellier University Hospital

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, MontpellierRan2021 to 2022Enrolled2,500ConditionsAnaphylaxis, Allergy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Anaphylaxis severity grade, during oral food challenges, assessed by five different classifications.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2025
    Observational
  6. Alternatives to Injectable Adrenaline for Treating Anaphylaxis.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Evangéline ClarkAllergy Unit of the Pneumology, Allergy and Thoracic Oncology Service, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Luciana Kase TannoAllergy Unit of the Pneumology, Allergy and Thoracic Oncology Service, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Tram VoIHU Méditerranée Infection, AP-HM, MEPHI, Marseille, France.
Brigitte BlancPediatric Emergency Department, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Pascal DemolyAllergy Unit of the Pneumology, Allergy and Thoracic Oncology Service, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Davide CaimmiAllergy Unit of the Pneumology, Allergy and Thoracic Oncology Service, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4481-6194

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnaphylaxis is a serious systemic hypersensitivity reaction that requires immediate recognition and prompt administration of epinephrine/adrenaline. The present study aimed to assess the appropriateness of epinephrine/adrenaline use in children identified as allergic by physicians in the emergency department (ED) at the time of the reaction, and to identify factors that are possibly associated with epinephrine/adrenaline administration, auto-injector prescription, and further referral to an allergist.

methodsWe performed a retrospective cross-sectional study at the pediatric ED of the University Hospital of Montpellier, France. We included all consecutive children who attended the ED between 2016 and 2020 with an allergy-related diagnosis at discharge.

resultsWe included 1056 allergy-related visits, including 224 (21.2%) with a diagnosis of anaphylaxis at discharge; only 17.0% of them received an epinephrine/adrenaline injection, and 57.1% consulted an allergist after the acute episode. An auto-injector was prescribed to 63 (28.1%) patients at discharge from the ED. Besides the severity of the clinical presentation, factors associated with a guidelines-based management of the anaphylactic reaction and with an increased administration rate of epinephrine/adrenaline included presence of asthma symptoms and presence of extended skin reactions.

conclusionsOur study underlines persistent gaps in the management of pediatric anaphylaxis in ED, focusing on hereby identified levers. By disseminating current knowledge and guidelines on anaphylaxis and allergies, specialists could work together with emergency physicians to establish effective management algorithms and improve anaphylaxis management and care pathways for children experiencing allergic reactions, especially anaphylaxis. TRAIL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials, number NCT05112367.

Indexed as

anaphylaxischildrenemergency departmentepinephrine/adrenalinetreatment

Identifiers

PMID37632240
PMCPMC10392053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.