ArticleBiophysical journal2023
DNA damage alters binding conformations of E. coli single-stranded DNA-binding protein.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanistic insights into direct DNA and RNA strand transfer and dynamic protein exchange of SSB and RPA.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Molecular insights into the prototypical single-stranded DNA-binding protein fromCritical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (SSBs) are essential cellular components, binding to transiently exposed regions of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) with high affinity and sequence non-specificity to coordinate DNA repair and replication. Escherichia coli SSB (EcSSB) is a homotetramer that wraps variable lengths of ssDNA in multiple conformations (typically occupying either 65 or 35 nt), which is well studied across experimental conditions of substrate length, salt, pH, temperature, etc. In this work, we use atomic force microscopy to investigate the binding of SSB to individual ssDNA molecules. We introduce non-canonical DNA bases that mimic naturally occurring DNA damage, synthetic abasic sites, as well as a non-DNA linker into our experimental constructs at sites predicted to interact with EcSSB. By measuring the fraction of DNA molecules with EcSSB bound as well as the volume of protein bound per DNA molecule, we determine the protein binding affinity, cooperativity, and conformation. We find that, with only one damaged nucleotide, the binding of EcSSB is unchanged relative to its binding to undamaged DNA. In the presence of either two tandem abasic sites or a non-DNA spacer, however, the binding affinity associated with a single EcSSB tetramer occupying the full substrate in the 65-nt mode is greatly reduced. In contrast, the binding of two EcSSB tetramers, each in the 35-nt mode, is preserved. Changes in the binding and cooperative behaviors of EcSSB across these constructs can inform how genomic repair and replication processes may change as environmental damage accumulates in DNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.