Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37631936›Full record

ArticleVaccines2023

Belarusian Healthcare Professionals' Views on Monkeypox and Vaccine Hesitancy.

Abanoub Riad, Nadzeya Rybakova, Nadzeya Dubatouka, Ina Zankevich, Miloslav Klugar, Michal Koščík, Anton Drobov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abanoub RiadDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-5918-8966
Nadzeya RybakovaMedical Center of Modern Pediatrics, Chervyakova Str. 55, 220053 Minsk, Belarus.
Nadzeya DubatoukaMedical Center of Modern Pediatrics, Chervyakova Str. 55, 220053 Minsk, Belarus.
Ina ZankevichBausch Health LLC, Olshevskogo Str. 22, 220073 Minsk, Belarus.
Miloslav KlugarInstitute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic (IHIS-CR), 128 01 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-2804-7295
Michal KoščíkDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-9243-6391
Anton DrobovDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-8946-591X

Funding

Masaryk University MUNI/A/1366/2022Ministry of Education Youth and Sports LX22NPO5101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the low transmission risk of Monkeypox (mpox) in Belarus, this study is vital as it contributes to our understanding of vaccine hesitancy among healthcare professionals (HCPs). It aims to assess vaccination perceptions and evaluate the willingness to pay for the vaccine among Belarusian HCPs, thereby enhancing pandemic preparedness.

methodsin October 2022, a cross-sectional survey-based study was conducted among Belarusian HCPs using a self-administered questionnaire (SAQ). Invitations were disseminated via social media platforms using a snowball sampling method. The SAQ encompassed various categories, including sociodemographic details, medical history, sources of mpox information, perceived and factual mpox knowledge, and perceptions of the mpox vaccine according to the health belief model (HBM), mpox vaccine acceptance and willingness to pay (WTP).

resultswhile a large proportion of respondents had good knowledge of mpox epidemiology and its clinical manifestations, their awareness of available vaccines and treatment options was limited. Consequently, a significant correlation was found between the history of influenza vaccination and mpox-related knowledge. Furthermore, the study showed that just over half of the participants (51.4%) were willing to receive the mpox vaccine if offered for free, safely, and effectively, with their decision largely influenced by perceived benefits (

conclusionsthis study highlights a significant knowledge gap among Belarusian HCPs about mpox vaccines and treatments, despite a general awareness of the disease's epidemiology and symptoms, and it underscores the need for targeted interventions to enhance mpox knowledge and vaccine acceptance.

Indexed as

cross-sectional studiesdisease outbreakshealth belief modelhealth personnelknowledgemonkeypoxRepublic of Belarussmallpox vaccinevaccination hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID37631936
PMCPMC10459544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.