Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37631924›Full record

ReviewVaccines2023

Addressing Nanovaccine Strategies for Tilapia.

Kim D Thompson, Channarong Rodkhum, Anurak Bunnoy, Patcharapong Thangsunan, Sirikorn Kitiyodom, Pimwarang Sukkarun, Jakarwan Yostawornkul, Teerapong Yata, Nopadon Pirarat

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Emerging Cationic Nanovaccines.Pharmaceutics · 2024
    Review
  7. Parvoviruses of Aquatic Animals.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  8. International journal of veterinary science and medicine · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kim D ThompsonMoredun Research Institute, Pentlands Science Park, Penicuik EH26 0PZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3550-4842
Channarong RodkhumCenter of Excellence in Fish Infectious (CE FID), Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-5711-9294
Anurak BunnoyCenter of Excellence in Aquatic Animal Health Management, Department of Aquaculture, Faculty of Fisheries, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-1782-4079
Patcharapong ThangsunanCenter of Excellence in Fish Infectious (CE FID), Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-5041-2535
Sirikorn KitiyodomWildlife, Exotic and Aquatic Animal Pathology Research Unit, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-5180-6675
Pimwarang SukkarunFaculty of Veterinary Science, Rajamangala University of Technology Srivijaya, Nakhon Si Thammarat 90000, Thailand.
Jakarwan YostawornkulWildlife, Exotic and Aquatic Animal Pathology Research Unit, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Teerapong YataBiochemistry Unit, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Nopadon PiraratWildlife, Exotic and Aquatic Animal Pathology Research Unit, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.
Chulalongkorn University · THKasetsart University · THMoredun Research Institute · GBRajamangala University of Technology Srivijaya · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tilapia is the world's most extensively farmed species after carp. It is an attractive species for aquaculture as it grows quickly, reaching harvest size within six to seven months of production, and provides an important source of food and revenue for many low-income families, especially in low- to middle-income countries. The expansion of tilapia aquaculture has resulted in an intensification of farming systems, and this has been associated with increased disease outbreaks caused by various pathogens, mostly bacterial and viral agents. Vaccination is routinely used to control disease in higher-value finfish species, such as Atlantic salmon. At the same time, many tilapia farmers are often unwilling to vaccinate their fish by injection once the fish have been moved to their grow-out site. Alternative vaccination strategies are needed to help tilapia farmers accept and use vaccines. There is increasing interest in nanoparticle-based vaccines as alternative methods for delivering vaccines to fish, especially for oral and immersion administration. They can potentially improve vaccine efficacy through the controlled release of antigens, protecting antigens from premature proteolytic degradation in the gastric tract, and facilitating antigen uptake and processing by antigen-presenting cells. They can also allow targeted delivery of the vaccine at mucosal sites. This review provides a brief overview of the bacterial and viral diseases affecting tilapia aquaculture and vaccine strategies for farmed tilapia. It focuses on the use of nanovaccines to improve the acceptance and uptake of vaccines by tilapia farmers.

Indexed as

mucosal immunitynanoparticlesOreochromis sp.tilapiavaccination

Identifiers

PMID37631924
PMCPMC10459980
OpenAlexW4385759747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.