ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Research on the Efficiency of Bridge Crack Detection by Coupling Deep Learning Frameworks with Convolutional Neural Networks.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ensemble learning based sustainable approach to rebuilding metal structures prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Study on the Influence of Label Image Accuracy on the Performance of Concrete Crack Segmentation Network Models.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bridge crack detection based on deep learning is a research area of great interest and difficulty in the field of bridge health detection. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of coupling a deep learning framework (DLF) with a convolutional neural network (CNN) for bridge crack detection. A dataset consisting of 2068 bridge crack images was randomly split into training, verification, and testing sets with a ratio of 8:1:1, respectively. Several CNN models, including Faster R-CNN, Single Shot MultiBox Detector (SSD), You Only Look Once (YOLO)-v5(x), U-Net, and Pyramid Scene Parsing Network (PSPNet), were used to conduct experiments using the PyTorch, TensorFlow2, and Keras frameworks. The experimental results show that the Harmonic Mean (F1) values of the detection results of the Faster R-CNN and SSD models under the Keras framework are relatively large (0.76 and 0.67, respectively, in the object detection model). The YOLO-v5(x) model of the TensorFlow2 framework achieved the highest F1 value of 0.67. In semantic segmentation models, the U-Net model achieved the highest detection result accuracy (AC) value of 98.37% under the PyTorch framework. The PSPNet model achieved the highest AC value of 97.86% under the TensorFlow2 framework. These experimental results provide optimal coupling efficiency parameters of a DLF and CNN for bridge crack detection. A more accurate and efficient DLF and CNN model for bridge crack detection has been obtained, which has significant practical application value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.