ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Adversarial Deep Transfer Learning in Fault Diagnosis: Progress, Challenges, and Future Prospects.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cross-Condition Fault Diagnosis of Crane Slewing Bearings Based on a Lightweight Domain-Adaptive Graph Convolutional Network.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Fault Diagnosis of Ship Chilled Water Units Based on a Hybrid Attention Domain-Adaptive Network.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Few-shot cross-domain fault diagnosis via adversarial meta-learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Adversarial Robustness Enhancement for Deep Learning-Based Soft Sensors: An Adversarial Training Strategy Using Historical Gradients and Domain Adaptation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep Transfer Learning (DTL) signifies a novel paradigm in machine learning, merging the superiorities of deep learning in feature representation with the merits of transfer learning in knowledge transference. This synergistic integration propels DTL to the forefront of research and development within the Intelligent Fault Diagnosis (IFD) sphere. While the early DTL paradigms, reliant on fine-tuning, demonstrated effectiveness, they encountered considerable obstacles in complex domains. In response to these challenges, Adversarial Deep Transfer Learning (ADTL) emerged. This review first categorizes ADTL into non-generative and generative models. The former expands upon traditional DTL, focusing on the efficient transference of features and mapping relationships, while the latter employs technologies such as Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) to facilitate feature transformation. A thorough examination of the recent advancements of ADTL in the IFD field follows. The review concludes by summarizing the current challenges and future directions for DTL in fault diagnosis, including issues such as data imbalance, negative transfer, and adversarial training stability. Through this cohesive analysis, this review aims to offer valuable insights and guidance for the optimization and implementation of ADTL in real-world industrial scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.