ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Methods and Applications of 3D Ground Crop Analysis Using LiDAR Technology: A Survey.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Maize Detection and Row Extraction Using Maize-YOLO and IPM-Clustering Method for Autonomous Agricultural Navigation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Winter wheat yield prediction using UAV-based multivariate time series data and variate-independent tokenization.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- A Review of Optical-Based Three-Dimensional Reconstruction and Multi-Source Fusion for Plant Phenotyping.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Automated Phenotypic Trait Extraction for Rice Plant Using Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) technology is positioning itself as one of the most effective non-destructive methods to collect accurate information on ground crop fields, as the analysis of the three-dimensional models that can be generated with it allows for quickly measuring several key parameters (such as yield estimations, aboveground biomass, vegetation indexes estimation, perform plant phenotyping, and automatic control of agriculture robots or machinery, among others). In this survey, we systematically analyze 53 research papers published between 2005 and 2022 that involve significant use of the LiDAR technology applied to the three-dimensional analysis of ground crops. Different dimensions are identified for classifying the surveyed papers (including application areas, crop species under study, LiDAR scanner technologies, mounting platform technologies, and the use of additional instrumentation and software tools). From our survey, we draw relevant conclusions about the use of LiDAR technologies, such as identifying a hierarchy of different scanning platforms and their frequency of use as well as establishing the trade-off between the economic costs of deploying LiDAR and the agronomically relevant information that effectively can be acquired. We also conclude that none of the approaches under analysis tackles the problem associated with working with multiple species with the same setup and configuration, which shows the need for instrument calibration and algorithmic fine tuning for an effective application of this technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.