Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37631740›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Machine Learning for Human Motion Intention Detection.

Jun-Ji Lin, Che-Kang Hsu, Wei-Li Hsu, Tsu-Chin Tsao, Fu-Cheng Wang, Jia-Yush Yen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jun-Ji LinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei City 106319, Taiwan.
Che-Kang HsuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei City 106319, Taiwan.
Wei-Li HsuSchool and Graduate Institute of Physical Therapy, National Taiwan University, No. 17, Xuzhou Rd., Zhongzheng Dist., Taipei City 100025, Taiwan.
Tsu-Chin TsaoMechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Samueli School of Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Fu-Cheng WangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei City 106319, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-5011-7934
Jia-Yush YenDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei City 106319, Taiwan.
National Taiwan University · TWNational Taiwan University of Science and Technology · TWUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan ROC 111-2811-E-011 -014 -MY3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gait pattern of exoskeleton control conflicting with the human operator's (the pilot) intention may cause awkward maneuvering or even injury. Therefore, it has been the focus of many studies to help decide the proper gait operation. However, the timing for the recognization plays a crucial role in the operation. The delayed detection of the pilot's intent can be equally undesirable to the exoskeleton operation. Instead of recognizing the motion, this study examines the possibility of identifying the transition between gaits to achieve in-time detection. This study used the data from IMU sensors for future mobile applications. Furthermore, we tested using two machine learning networks: a linearfFeedforward neural network and a long short-term memory network. The gait data are from five subjects for training and testing. The study results show that: 1. The network can successfully separate the transition period from the motion periods. 2. The detection of gait change from walking to sitting can be as fast as 0.17 s, which is adequate for future control applications. However, detecting the transition from standing to walking can take as long as 1.2 s. 3. This study also find that the network trained for one person can also detect movement changes for different persons without deteriorating the performance.

Indexed as

IntentionMovementGaitHumansMachine LearningMotionfeedforward neural network (FNN)human intention detectionhuman–robot interactioninertial measurement unit (IMU)long short-term memory (LSTM)

Identifiers

PMID37631740
PMCPMC10459653
OpenAlexW4385873530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.