Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37631728›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

A Systematic Review of Data-Driven Attack Detection Trends in IoT.

Safwana Haque, Fadi El-Moussa, Nikos Komninos, Rajarajan Muttukrishnan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Safwana HaqueDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, School of Science & Technology, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3519-862X
Fadi El-MoussaBT Group PLC, Ipswich IP5 3RE, UK.
Nikos KomninosDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, School of Science & Technology, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2776-1283
Rajarajan MuttukrishnanDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, School of Science & Technology, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Internet of Things is perhaps a concept that the world cannot be imagined without today, having become intertwined in our everyday lives in the domestic, corporate and industrial spheres. However, irrespective of the convenience, ease and connectivity provided by the Internet of Things, the security issues and attacks faced by this technological framework are equally alarming and undeniable. In order to address these various security issues, researchers race against evolving technology, trends and attacker expertise. Though much work has been carried out on network security to date, it is still seen to be lagging in the field of Internet of Things networks. This study surveys the latest trends used in security measures for threat detection, primarily focusing on the machine learning and deep learning techniques applied to Internet of Things datasets. It aims to provide an overview of the IoT datasets available today, trends in machine learning and deep learning usage, and the efficiencies of these algorithms on a variety of relevant datasets. The results of this comprehensive survey can serve as a guide and resource for identifying the various datasets, experiments carried out and future research directions in this field.

Indexed as

cyberattackdatasetsintrusion detectionIoTmachine learningthreat detection

Identifiers

PMID37631728
PMCPMC10457981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.