ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensor Transducers for Acoustic Emission Applications.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Piezoelectric materials are defined by their ability to display a charge across their surface in response to mechanical strain, making them great for use in sensing applications. Such applications include pressure sensors, medical devices, energy harvesting and structural health monitoring (SHM). SHM describes the process of using a systematic approach to identify damage in engineering infrastructure. A method of SHM that uses piezoelectric wafers connected directly to the structure has become increasingly popular. An investigation of a novel pitch-catch method of determining instrumentation quality of piezoelectric wafer active sensors (PWASs) used in SHM was conducted as well as an investigation into the effects of defects in piezoelectric sensors and sensor bonding on the sensor response. This pitch-catch method was able to verify defect-less instrumentation quality of pristinely bonded PWASs. Additionally, the pitch-catch method was compared with the electromechanical impedance method in determining defects in piezoelectric sensor instrumentation. Using the pitch-catch method, it was found that defective instrumentation resulted in decreasing amplitude of received and transmitted signals as well as changes in the frequency spectrums of the signals, such as the elimination of high frequency peaks in those with defects in the bonding layer and an increased amplitude of around 600 kHz for a broken PWAS. The electromechanical impedance method concluded that bonding layer defects increase the primary frequency peak's amplitude and cause a downward frequency shift in both the primary and secondary frequency peaks in the impedance spectrum, while a broken sensor has the primary peak amplitude reduced while shifting upward and nearly eliminating the secondary peak.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.