Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37631628›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Efficient Photoacoustic Image Synthesis with Deep Learning.

Tom Rix, Kris K Dreher, Jan-Hinrich Nölke, Melanie Schellenberg, Minu D Tizabi, Alexander Seitel, Lena Maier-Hein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tom RixDivision of Intelligent Medical Systems, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 223, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0322-0370
Kris K DreherDivision of Intelligent Medical Systems, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 223, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9179-9414
Jan-Hinrich NölkeDivision of Intelligent Medical Systems, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 223, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7600-3839
Melanie SchellenbergDivision of Intelligent Medical Systems, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 223, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7911-5622
Minu D TizabiDivision of Intelligent Medical Systems, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 223, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Alexander SeitelDivision of Intelligent Medical Systems, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 223, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5919-9646
Lena Maier-HeinDivision of Intelligent Medical Systems, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 223, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4910-9368

Funding

European Research Council 101002198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photoacoustic imaging potentially allows for the real-time visualization of functional human tissue parameters such as oxygenation but is subject to a challenging underlying quantification problem. While in silico studies have revealed the great potential of deep learning (DL) methodology in solving this problem, the inherent lack of an efficient gold standard method for model training and validation remains a grand challenge. This work investigates whether DL can be leveraged to accurately and efficiently simulate photon propagation in biological tissue, enabling photoacoustic image synthesis. Our approach is based on estimating the initial pressure distribution of the photoacoustic waves from the underlying optical properties using a back-propagatable neural network trained on synthetic data. In proof-of-concept studies, we validated the performance of two complementary neural network architectures, namely a conventional U-Net-like model and a Fourier Neural Operator (FNO) network. Our in silico validation on multispectral human forearm images shows that DL methods can speed up image generation by a factor of 100 when compared to Monte Carlo simulations with 5×108 photons. While the FNO is slightly more accurate than the U-Net, when compared to Monte Carlo simulations performed with a reduced number of photons (5×106), both neural network architectures achieve equivalent accuracy. In contrast to Monte Carlo simulations, the proposed DL models can be used as inherently differentiable surrogate models in the photoacoustic image synthesis pipeline, allowing for back-propagation of the synthesis error and gradient-based optimization over the entire pipeline. Due to their efficiency, they have the potential to enable large-scale training data generation that can expedite the clinical application of photoacoustic imaging.

Indexed as

Deep LearningForearmHumansMonte Carlo MethodNeural Networks, ComputerSpectrum Analysisdeep learningFourier Neural Operatorimage synthesisMonte Carlo simulationmultispectral functional imagingphotoacoustic imagingsurrogate model

Identifiers

PMID37631628
PMCPMC10457787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.