ArticlePolymers2023
Quantifying the Residual Stiffness of Concrete Beams with Polymeric Reinforcement under Repeated Loads.
Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Editorial: Advanced Polymer Composite Materials: Processing, Modeling, Properties and Applications II.Polymers · 2024Article
- The Material Heterogeneity Effect on the Local Resistance of Pultruded GFRP Columns.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current technology development ensures a variety of advanced materials and options for reinforcing concrete structures. However, the absence of a uniform testing methodology complicates the quantification and comparative analysis of the mechanical performance of the composite systems. The repeated mechanical loads further complicate the issue. This research extends the recently developed residual stiffness assessment concept to the repeated loading case. It provides an engineer with a simplified testing layout and analytical model to quantify the residual flexural stiffness of standardized laboratory specimens subjected to repeated cycling loads. This model explicitly relates the particular moment and curvature values, requiring neither iterative calculations nor the load history. Thus, this feature allows residual stiffness quantification under repeated loading conditions, including complete reloading of the beam samples imitating the structural strengthening procedure; the proposed technique is equally efficient in quantifying the residual stiffness of the beam samples with any combinations of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) reinforcements, i.e., embedded bars, near-surface-mounted strips, and externally bonded sheets. This study employs 12 flexural elements with various reinforcement and loading layouts to illustrate the proposed methodology's efficiency in quantifying the residual strength of the tension concrete, which estimates the efficiency of the reinforcement system. The explicit quantifying of the residual resistance of the FRP reinforcement systems under repeated load cycles describes the essential novelty of this work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.