Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Olga A AleynovaLaboratory of Biotechnology, Federal Scientific Center of the East 27Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 690022 Vladivostok, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2549-8568
Nikolay N NityagovskyLaboratory of Biotechnology, Federal Scientific Center of the East 27Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 690022 Vladivostok, Russia.
Alexey A AnanevLaboratory of Biotechnology, Federal Scientific Center of the East 27Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 690022 Vladivostok, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4671-3586
Andrey R SuprunLaboratory of Biotechnology, Federal Scientific Center of the East 27Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 690022 Vladivostok, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1036-680X
Zlata V OgnevaLaboratory of Biotechnology, Federal Scientific Center of the East 27Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 690022 Vladivostok, Russia.
Alina A DneprovskayaLaboratory of Biotechnology, Federal Scientific Center of the East 27Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 690022 Vladivostok, Russia.
Alina A BereshLaboratory of Biotechnology, Federal Scientific Center of the East 27Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 690022 Vladivostok, Russia.
Alexey P TyuninLaboratory of Biotechnology, Federal Scientific Center of the East 27Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 690022 Vladivostok, Russia.
Alexandra S DubrovinaLaboratory of Biotechnology, Federal Scientific Center of the East 27Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 690022 Vladivostok, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0516-6144
Konstantin V KiselevLaboratory of Biotechnology, Federal Scientific Center of the East 27Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 690022 Vladivostok, Russia.
Funding
Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation 121031000144-5Russian Science Foundation 22-74-10001
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Many grape endophytic microorganisms exhibit high potential for suppressing the development of grape diseases and stimulating grapevine growth and fitness, as well as beneficial properties of the crop. The microbiome of wild grapevines is a promising source of biocontrol agents, which can be beneficial for domesticated grapevines. Using next-generation sequencing (NGS) and classical microbiology techniques, we performed an analysis of bacterial and fungal endophytic communities of wild grapevines
Indexed as
16SbacteriabiodiversityendophytesfungiITS1microbiomenext-generation sequencingVitis amurensisVitis coignetiaewild relatives of domesticated plants
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
The Endophytic Microbiome of Wild Grapevines · full record | OpenQuestion