Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37631128›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Plant Essential Oils as Biopesticides: Applications, Mechanisms, Innovations, and Constraints.

Ipsa Gupta, Rishikesh Singh, Suganthi Muthusamy, Mansi Sharma, Kamaljit Grewal, Harminder Pal Singh, Daizy R Batish

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
58.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Chitosan Coatings with Essential Oil ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Essential Oils ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ipsa GuptaDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9382-9886
Rishikesh SinghDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7862-1497
Suganthi MuthusamyDepartment of Biotechnology, Vels Institute of Science, Technology & Advanced Studies, Pallavaram, Chennai 600117, India.
Mansi SharmaDepartment of Environment Studies, Faculty of Science, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India.
Kamaljit GrewalDepartment of Botany, Khalsa College for Women, Civil Lines, Ludhiana 141001, India.
Harminder Pal SinghDepartment of Environment Studies, Faculty of Science, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India.
Daizy R BatishDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2200-7345
Panjab University · INVels University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of the "Green Revolution" was a great success in significantly increasing crop productivity. However, it involved high ecological costs in terms of excessive use of synthetic agrochemicals, raising concerns about agricultural sustainability. Indiscriminate use of synthetic pesticides resulted in environmental degradation, the development of pest resistance, and possible dangers to a variety of nontarget species (including plants, animals, and humans). Thus, a sustainable approach necessitates the exploration of viable ecofriendly alternatives. Plant-based biopesticides are attracting considerable attention in this context due to their target specificity, ecofriendliness, biodegradability, and safety for humans and other life forms. Among all the relevant biopesticides, plant essential oils (PEOs) or their active components are being widely explored against weeds, pests, and microorganisms. This review aims to collate the information related to the expansion and advancement in research and technology on the applications of PEOs as biopesticides. An insight into the mechanism of action of PEO-based bioherbicides, bioinsecticides, and biofungicides is also provided. With the aid of bibliometric analysis, it was found that ~75% of the documents on PEOs having biopesticidal potential were published in the last five years, with an annual growth rate of 20.51% and a citation per document of 20.91. Research on the biopesticidal properties of PEOs is receiving adequate attention from European (Italy and Spain), Asian (China, India, Iran, and Saudi Arabia), and American (Argentina, Brazil, and the United States of America) nations. Despite the increasing biopesticidal applications of PEOs and their widespread acceptance by governments, they face many challenges due to their inherent nature (lipophilicity and high volatility), production costs, and manufacturing constraints. To overcome these limitations, the incorporation of emerging innovations like the nanoencapsulation of PEOs, bioinformatics, and RNA-Seq in biopesticide development has been proposed. With these novel technological interventions, PEO-based biopesticides have the potential to be used for sustainable pest management in the future.

Indexed as

agricultural sustainabilitybotanical pesticidesencapsulationnanoformulationsplant extractsweed management

Identifiers

PMID37631128
PMCPMC10458566
OpenAlexW4385759760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.