Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37630837›Full record

ReviewNutrients2023

Development of Gut Microbiota in the First 1000 Days after Birth and Potential Interventions.

Alexandru Cosmin Pantazi, Adriana Luminita Balasa, Cristina Maria Mihai, Tatiana Chisnoiu, Vasile Valeriu Lupu, Mustafa Ali Kassim Kassim, Larisia Mihai, Corina Elena Frecus, Sergiu Ioachim Chirila, Ancuta Lupu and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Alexandru Cosmin PantaziPediatrics Department, Faculty of Medicine, "Ovidius" University, 900470 Constanta, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-7234-2814
Adriana Luminita BalasaPediatrics Department, Faculty of Medicine, "Ovidius" University, 900470 Constanta, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-5793-1370
Cristina Maria MihaiPediatrics Department, Faculty of Medicine, "Ovidius" University, 900470 Constanta, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-8844-0593
Tatiana ChisnoiuPediatrics Department, Faculty of Medicine, "Ovidius" University, 900470 Constanta, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-4996-2484
Vasile Valeriu LupuPediatrics Department, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-2640-8795
Mustafa Ali Kassim KassimFaculty of Medicine, "Ovidius" University, 900470 Constanta, Romania.ORCID 0009-0009-5737-2634
Larisia MihaiPediatrics Department, Faculty of Medicine, "Ovidius" University, 900470 Constanta, Romania.
Corina Elena FrecusPediatrics Department, Faculty of Medicine, "Ovidius" University, 900470 Constanta, Romania.
Sergiu Ioachim ChirilaFaculty of Medicine, "Ovidius" University, 900470 Constanta, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-3275-2330
Ancuta LupuPediatrics Department, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-8147-3632
Antonio AndruscaPediatrics Department, Faculty of Medicine, "Ovidius" University, 900470 Constanta, Romania.
Constantin IonescuFaculty of Medicine, "Ovidius" University, 900470 Constanta, Romania.
Viviana CuzicPediatrics Department, Faculty of Medicine, "Ovidius" University, 900470 Constanta, Romania.
Simona Claudia CambreaInfectious Diseases Department, Faculty of Medicine, "Ovidius" University, 900470 Constanta, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4898-8938

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first 1000 days after birth represent a critical window for gut microbiome development, which is essential for immune system maturation and overall health. The gut microbiome undergoes major changes during this period due to shifts in diet and environment. Disruptions to the microbiota early in life can have lasting health effects, including increased risks of inflammatory disorders, autoimmune diseases, neurological disorders, and obesity. Maternal and environmental factors during pregnancy and infancy shape the infant gut microbiota. In this article, we will review how maintaining a healthy gut microbiome in pregnancy and infancy is important for long-term infant health. Furthermore, we briefly include fungal colonization and its effects on the host immune function, which are discussed as part of gut microbiome ecosystem. Additionally, we will describe how potential approaches such as hydrogels enriched with prebiotics and probiotics, gut microbiota transplantation (GMT) during pregnancy, age-specific microbial ecosystem therapeutics, and CRISPR therapies targeting the gut microbiota hold potential for advancing research and development. Nevertheless, thorough evaluation of their safety, effectiveness, and lasting impacts is crucial prior to their application in clinical approach. The article emphasizes the need for continued research to optimize gut microbiota and immune system development through targeted early-life interventions.

Indexed as

Autoimmune DiseasesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaEarly Intervention, EducationalFemaleHumansInfantParturitionPregnancybreastfeedingchildrencolonizationmicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID37630837
PMCPMC10457741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.