Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37630798›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2023

The Impact of the First and Second Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Eating Symptoms and Dysfunctional Eating Behaviours in the General Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Rubinia Celeste Bonfanti, Lucia Sideli, Arianna Teti, Alessandro Musetti, Stefania Cella, Nadia Barberis, Bianca Borsarini, Lucia Fortunato, Cristina Sechi, Nadia Micali and 1 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. The current clinical approach to feeding and eating disorders aimed to increase personalization of management.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rubinia Celeste BonfantiFaculty of Human and Social Sciences, Kore University of Enna, 94100 Enna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3119-7013
Lucia SideliDepartment of Human Science, LUMSA University, 00193 Rome, Italy.
Arianna TetiDepartment of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy.
Alessandro MusettiDepartment of Humanities, Social Sciences and Cultural Industries, University of Parma, 43121 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4125-0068
Stefania CellaObservatory on Eating Disorders, Department of Psychology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 81100 Caserta, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5604-9415
Nadia BarberisDepartment of Health Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6489-2779
Bianca BorsariniMental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark, Eating Disorders Research Unit, Psychiatric Centre Ballerup, 2750 Ballerup, Denmark.
Lucia FortunatoDepartment of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy.
Cristina SechiDepartment of Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, University of Cagliari, 09123 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2896-312X
Nadia MicaliMental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark, Eating Disorders Research Unit, Psychiatric Centre Ballerup, 2750 Ballerup, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5571-2273
Gianluca Lo CocoDepartment of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9027-1899

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the prevalence of feeding and eating disorder (FED) symptoms or dysfunctional eating behaviours (DEB) in the general population during the COVID-19 outbreak.

methodWe searched eligible articles in biomedical databases from 1 January 2020 to 31 March 2022. Prevalence rates of FED or DEB changes between pre-pandemic and pandemic time and correlation with psychological distress were pooled with a meta-analysis using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was tested using I-squared (

resultsThe more prevalent FED or DEB during the COVID-19 outbreak were: body image concerns (52%, 95% CI 0.38, 0.66), binge eating (40%, 95% CI 0.25, 0.55), and overeating (40%, 95% CI = 0.32-0.48). Pooled data of longitudinal studies (k = 8) only showed a significant difference in the prevalence of weight gain from pre-pandemic to the pandemic time. Finally, increased levels of psychological distress (k = 35) positively correlated with some ED symptoms.

conclusionThis meta-analysis evidenced a negative impact of the pandemic on eating symptoms and DEB in the general population.

Indexed as

Binge-Eating DisorderCOVID-19Body ImageFeeding BehaviorHumansPandemicsCOVID-19dysfunctional eating behaviourseating disordersgeneral populationmeta-analysissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37630798
PMCPMC10458761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.