Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37629781›Full record

ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2023

When Critical View of Safety Fails: A Practical Perspective on Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Catalin Alius, Dragos Serban, Dan Georgian Bratu, Laura Carina Tribus, Geta Vancea, Paul Lorin Stoica, Ion Motofei, Corneliu Tudor, Crenguta Serboiu, Daniel Ovidiu Costea and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Catalin AliusFaculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Dragos SerbanFaculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-1380-2112
Dan Georgian BratuFaculty of Medicine, University "Lucian Blaga", 550169 Sibiu, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-8612-6293
Laura Carina TribusFaculty of Dental Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, 020021Bucharest, Romania.
Geta VanceaFaculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-2133-909X
Paul Lorin StoicaFaculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Ion MotofeiFaculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Corneliu TudorFaculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Crenguta SerboiuFaculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Daniel Ovidiu CosteaFaculty of Medicine, Ovidius University Constanta, 900470 Constanta, Romania.
Bogdan SerbanFaculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Ana Maria DascaluFaculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-7474-2395
Ciprian TanasescuFaculty of Medicine, University "Lucian Blaga", 550169 Sibiu, Romania.
Bogdan GeavleteFaculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Bogdan Mihai CristeaFaculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROLucian Blaga University of Sibiu · ROOvidius University · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of common bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) remains three times higher than that following open surgery despite numerous attempts to decrease intraoperative incidents by employing better training, superior surgical instruments, imaging techniques, or strategic concepts. This paper is a narrative review which discusses from a contextual point of view the need to standardise the surgical approach in difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies, the main strategic operative concepts and techniques, complementary visualisation aids for the delineation of anatomical landmarks, and the importance of cognitive maps and algorithms in performing safer LC. Extensive research was carried out in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Elsevier databases using the terms "difficult cholecystectomy", "bile duct injuries", "safe cholecystectomy", and "laparoscopy in acute cholecystitis". The key content and findings of this research suggest there is high intersocietal variation in approaching and performing LC, in the use of visualisation aids, and in the application of safety concepts. Limited papers offer guidelines based on robust data and a timid recognition of the human factors and ergonomic concepts in improving the outcomes associated with difficult cholecystectomies. This paper highlights the most relevant recommendations for dealing with difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicLaparoscopyAlgorithmsCholecystectomyDatabases, FactualHumansacute cholecystitisanatomical landmarksbailout surgerybile duct injurycritical view of safetylaparoscopic cholecystectomy

Identifiers

PMID37629781
PMCPMC10456257
OpenAlexW4386028440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.