Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37629564›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Assessment of Visual Quality Improvement as a Result of Spectacle Personalization.

Fruzsina Benyó, Lilla István, Huba Kiss, Andrea Gyenes, Gábor Erdei, Éva Juhász, Natalia Vlasak, Claudia Unger, Tamás Andorfi, Kata Réz and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fruzsina BenyóDepartment of Ophthalmology, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary.
Lilla IstvánDepartment of Ophthalmology, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary.
Huba KissDepartment of Ophthalmology, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary.
Andrea GyenesDepartment of Ophthalmology, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary.
Gábor ErdeiDepartment of Atomic Physics, Institute of Physics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, 1111 Budapest, Hungary.
Éva JuhászDepartment of Ophthalmology, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary.
Natalia VlasakHoya Vision Care, 1043NX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Claudia UngerHoya Vision Care, 1043NX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tamás AndorfiDepartment of Clinical Ophthalmology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Semmelweis University, 1088 Budapest, Hungary.
Kata RézDepartment of Clinical Ophthalmology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Semmelweis University, 1088 Budapest, Hungary.
Illés KovácsDepartment of Ophthalmology, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary.
Zoltán Zsolt NagyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary.
Semmelweis University · HUBudapest University of Technology and Economics · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Personalized spectacles customized according to an individual's facial anatomy were developed to provide enhanced visual performance and overall comfort when compared to standard spectacles. In this comparative crossover trial, each subject was randomly assigned to wear either personalized spectacles or standard spectacles for two weeks and then tried the second pair for another two weeks. Visual acuity and reading speed were measured, and visual quality and comfort were assessed using specific questionnaires. The correlation of the wearing parameters with the subjects' satisfaction was calculated. According to our results, the subjects wearing personalized glasses reported significantly less experience of swaying and significantly higher overall satisfaction compared to those wearing the control spectacles. At the end of the study, 62% of subjects preferred the personalized spectacles, and visual quality was the primary reason for their spectacle preference followed by wearing comfort. The difference from the ideal cornea-vertex distance was significantly lower when wearing the personalized spectacles compared to the control frames. In addition, the absolute value of the difference from the ideal cornea-vertex distance was significantly correlated with patient satisfaction. These results suggest that personalized spectacles, customized according to an individual's facial anatomy for the ideal wearing parameters, result in both visual and comfort advantages for wearers.

Indexed as

personalized spectacleprogressive addition lensvisual quality

Identifiers

PMID37629564
PMCPMC10455981
OpenAlexW4385654839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.