Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37629551›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Disposable Duodenoscopes: Evidence and Open Issues.

Clara Benedetta Conti, Fabrizio Cereatti, Raffaele Salerno, Roberto Grassia, Miki Scaravaglio, Carmen Laurenza, Marco Emilio Dinelli

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Clara Benedetta ContiInterventional Endoscopy Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via GB Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9774-2374
Fabrizio CereattiGastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Ospedale dei Castelli, 00040 Ariccia, Italy.
Raffaele SalernoDivision of Gastroenterology, Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Fatebenefratelli Sacco, 20121 Milano, Italy.
Roberto GrassiaGastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Cremona, 26100 Cremona, Italy.
Miki ScaravaglioInterventional Endoscopy Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via GB Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy.
Carmen LaurenzaGastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Cremona, 26100 Cremona, Italy.
Marco Emilio DinelliInterventional Endoscopy Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via GB Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, Italy.
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Duodenoscope-related infections are a major concern in medicine and GI endoscopy, especially in fragile patients. Disposable duodenoscopes seem to be the right tool to minimize the problem: a good choice for patients with many comorbidities or with a high risk of carrying multidrug resistant bacteria. Urgent endoscopy could also be a good setting for the use of single-use duodenoscopes, especially when the risk of the infection cannot be evaluated. Their safety and efficacy in performing ERCP has been proven in many studies. However, randomized clinical trials and comparative large studies with reusable scopes are lacking. Moreover, the present early stage of their introduction on the market does not allow a large economical evaluation for each health system. Thus, accurate economical and safety comparisons with cap-disposable duodenoscopes are needed. Moreover, the environmental impact of single-use duodenoscopes should be carefully evaluated, considering the ongoing climate change. In conclusion, definitive guidelines are needed to choose wisely the appropriate patients for ERCP with disposable duodenoscopes as the complete switch to single-use duodenoscopes seems to be difficult, to date. Many issues are still open, and they need to be carefully evaluated in further, larger studies.

Indexed as

cap disposable duodenoscopeseconomic impactendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyenvironmental impactsingle-use duodenoscopes

Identifiers

PMID37629551
PMCPMC10456022
OpenAlexW4385602871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.