ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023
The Accuracy of Zygomatic Implant Placement Assisted by Dynamic Computer-Aided Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06155799 (Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation System on Zygomatic Implant Placement), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation System on Zygomatic Implant Placement: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- The accuracy of robotic-assisted zygomatic implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Pooled it
- Accuracy of Zygomatic Implant Placement Using Completely Versus Partially Guided.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Accuracy of template-guided zygomatic implant placement: a retrospective case series using cone-beam computed tomography.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2026Article
- Investigation of the long-term prognosis (3-13 Years) of full mouth implant prosthetics combining zygomatic implants based on the all-on-four concept.International journal of implant dentistry · 2026Article
- Robotic Quad Zygomatic Implant Surgery Accuracy Ex Vivo With a New Semi-Autonomous Optically-Driven Haptic System.Clinical implant dentistry and related research · 2026Article
- A Real-Time Inertial Sensor-Based Diagnostic Support System for Improving Angular Accuracy in Dental Implant Placement: Preclinical Experimental Validation in a 3D Haptic Simulation Model.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Atrophic Maxilla by Extrasinus Zygomatic Implants: An Illustrative Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Rescue Therapy With Quad Zygoma After Failure of Full-Arch Implant Rehabilitation: A Retrospective Study With a Mean Follow-Up of 8 Years.Clinical oral implants research · 2026Article
- Article
- Static-Computer Assisted Implant Surgery: Where Are We Now?Australian dental journal · 2025Review
- Orbital Cellutitis and Peri-Zygomatic Cutaneous Fistula After Monolateral Double Zygomatic Implant Placement: Case Report and Narrative Literature Review.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Accuracy of Static and Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery During Dental Implant Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery · 2025Review
- Evaluation of the Accuracy, Surgical Time, and Learning Curve of Freehand, Static, and Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery in an In Vitro Study.Clinical oral implants research · 2025Article
- Bone Resorption Assessment Following Zygomatic Implants Surgery over 10 Years of Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The Rehabilitation of Partially Edentulous Maxilla With Unilateral Zygomatic Implants: A Retrospective Study up to 23 Years Follow-Up.Clinical oral implants research · 2025Article
- A modified protocol merging two published techniques for computer guided zygomatic implants surgery: a technical note.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Accuracy of augmented reality navigated surgery for placement of zygomatic implants: a human cadaver study.PeerJ · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe present systematic review aimed to investigate the accuracy of zygomatic implant (ZI) placement using dynamic computer-aided surgery (d-CAIS), static computer-aided surgery (s-CAIS), and a free-hand approach in patients with severe atrophic edentulous maxilla and/or deficient maxilla.
methodsElectronic and manual literature searches until May 2023 were performed in the PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. Clinical trials and cadaver studies were selected. The primary outcome was planned/placed deviation. Secondary outcomes were to evaluate the survival of ZI and surgical complications. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted and meta-regression was utilized to compare fiducial registration amounts for d-CAIS and the different designs of s-CAIS.
resultsA total of 14 studies with 511 ZIs were included (Nobel Biocare: 274, Southern Implant: 42, SIN Implant: 16, non-mentioned: 179). The pooled mean ZI deviations from the d-CAIS group were 1.81 mm (95% CI: 1.34-2.29) at the entry point and 2.95 mm (95% CI: 1.66-4.24) at the apex point, and angular deviations were 3.49 degrees (95% CI: 2.04-4.93). The pooled mean ZI deviations from the s-CAIS group were 1.19 mm (95% CI: 0.83-1.54) at the entry point and 1.80 mm (95% CI: 1.10-2.50) at the apex point, and angular deviations were 2.15 degrees (95% CI: 1.43-2.88). The pooled mean ZI deviations from the free-hand group were 2.04 mm (95% CI: 1.69-2.39) at the entry point and 3.23 mm (95% CI: 2.34-4.12) at the apex point, and angular deviations were 4.92 degrees (95% CI: 3.86-5.98). There was strong evidence of differences in the average entry, apex, and angular deviation between the navigation, surgical guide, and free-hand groups (
conclusionUsing d-CAIS and modified s-CAIS for ZI surgery has shown clinically acceptable outcomes regarding average entry, apex, and angular deviations. The maximal deviation values were predominantly observed in the conventional s-CAIS. Surgeons should be mindful of potential deviations and complications regardless of the decision making in different guide approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.