ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023
Comparison of MRI vs. [
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Subtype-Specific Metabolic Patterns in Staging Breast Cancer: Insights from Conventional and Parametric PET Radiomics.Cancers · 2026Article
- [La Radiologia medica · 2026Review
- Extent of resection in breast conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a literature review.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026Review
- Predicting pathological complete response to breast cancer neoadjuvant therapy using multi-combination machine learning models based on vision transformer features.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Evolution and Clinical Impact of Deep Learning Technologies in Breast MRI.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Assessment of Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Using MRI andEuropean journal of breast health · 2025Article
- Gramado consensus on imaging evaluation of the response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer.Radiologia brasileiraReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.